From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753645Ab1JJRhZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Oct 2011 13:37:25 -0400 Received: from smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com ([65.115.85.73]:27834 "EHLO smtp-outbound-2.vmware.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750893Ab1JJRhY (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Oct 2011 13:37:24 -0400 Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 10:37:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Andrei Warkentin To: Greg KH Cc: "G, Manjunath Kondaiah" , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Grant Likely , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dilan Lee , Mark Brown , Manjunath@jasper.es, Josh Triplett Message-ID: <361419345.198335.1318268242916.JavaMail.root@zimbra-prod-mbox-2.vmware.com> In-Reply-To: <20111008155502.GB616@kroah.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] drivercore: Add driver probe deferral mechanism MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.113.61.162] X-Mailer: Zimbra 7.1.1_GA_3225 (ZimbraWebClient - FF3.0 (Linux)/7.1.1_GA_3225) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Greg KH" > To: "Josh Triplett" > Cc: "G, Manjunath Kondaiah" , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, "Grant Likely" > , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, > "Dilan Lee" , "Mark Brown" , Manjunath@jasper.es > Sent: Saturday, October 8, 2011 11:55:02 AM > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] drivercore: Add driver probe deferral mechanism > I'm a bit of a fly on the wall here, but I'm curious how this impacts suspend/resume. device_initialize->device_pm_init are called from device_register, so certainly this patch doesn't also ensure that the PM ordering matches probe ordering, which is bound to break suspend, right? Was this ever tested with the OMAP target? Shouldn't the PM change be also part of this patch set? I don't see why you would want to have this in without the PM changes. Maybe I have it all wrong though :-). A