mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Mark Gross <mgross@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: 2.6.23-mm1 breaks C-state support on Intel T7200 x86_64
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2007 12:19:44 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3624.1194542384@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1958 bytes --]

(Sorry for not reporting this sooner - I haven't been running off battery
much in the last 3 weeks, so I didn't notice it till now...)

Dell Latitude D820 laptop, T7200 Core2 Duo CPU, x86_64 kernel.

As reported by 'powertop' on a basically idle machine:

2.6.23-mm1:

Cn                Avg residency       P-states (frequencies)
C0 (cpu running)        (100.0%)        2.00 Ghz     0.8%
C1                0.0ms ( 0.0%)         1.67 Ghz     0.0%
C2                0.0ms ( 0.0%)         1333 Mhz     0.0%
C3                0.0ms ( 0.0%)         1000 Mhz    99.2%

2.6.23-rc8-mm2:

Cn                Avg residency       P-states (frequencies)
C0 (cpu running)        ( 0.3%)         2.00 Ghz     0.0%
C1                0.0ms ( 0.0%)         1.67 Ghz     0.0%
C2                0.0ms ( 0.0%)         1333 Mhz     0.0%
C3               31.5ms (99.7%)         1000 Mhz   100.0%

In addition, the ACPI power estimate reported about 25 watts for 23-mm1,
but only 21 watts for -rc8-mm2, a significant regression.

I bisected this down to this set of patches:

pm-qos-infrastructure-and-interface.patch
pm-qos-infrastructure-and-interface-fix.patch
pm-qos-infrastructure-and-interface-vs-git-acpi.patch
pm-qos-infrastructure-and-interface-vs-git-acpi-2.patch
latencyc-use-qos-infrastructure.patch

The patch says:

  To register the default pm_qos target for the specific parameter, the
  process must open one of /dev/[cpu_dma_latency, network_latency,
  network_throughput]

  As long as the device node is held open that process has a registered
  requirement on the parameter.  The name of the requirement is
  "process_<PID>" derived from the current->pid from within the open system
  call.

I shouldn't have to have a process open a /dev/file, write a number, and then
stay around forever so the file doesn't close in order to get the same behavior
I was getting by default before.  What needs to happen to get this to not
be a behavior regression/change?





[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 226 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2007-11-08 17:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-08 17:19 Valdis.Kletnieks [this message]
2007-11-08 18:02 ` Andrew Morton
2007-11-08 20:03   ` Mark Gross
2007-11-08 20:15     ` Andrew Morton
2007-11-08 18:07 ` Mark Gross
2007-11-08 22:30 ` Mark Gross
2007-11-09 20:24   ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-11-12  4:26     ` mark gross

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3624.1194542384@turing-police.cc.vt.edu \
    --to=valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgross@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®