From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935329AbdEKOs5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 May 2017 10:48:57 -0400 Received: from cloudserver094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:61179 "EHLO cloudserver094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933016AbdEKOrV (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 May 2017 10:47:21 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Will Deacon Cc: Geetha sowjanya , Lv Zheng , Robert Moore , robin.murphy@arm.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, hanjun.guo@linaro.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, jcm@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robert.richter@cavium.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, sgoutham@cavium.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, geethasowjanya.akula@gmail.com, linu.cherian@cavium.com, Charles.Garcia-Tobin@arm.com, Geetha Sowjanya Subject: Re: [v5 1/4] ACPICA: IORT: Add Cavium ThunderX2 SMMUv3 model definition. Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 16:40:51 +0200 Message-ID: <3624921.NlXkYaVXxR@aspire.rjw.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.11.0-rc6+; KDE/4.14.9; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20170511084525.GA18839@arm.com> References: <1494415918-13770-1-git-send-email-gakula@caviumnetworks.com> <3122711.vgvub3W1fy@aspire.rjw.lan> <20170511084525.GA18839@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday, May 11, 2017 09:45:25 AM Will Deacon wrote: > On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 02:26:02AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Wednesday, May 10, 2017 05:01:55 PM Geetha sowjanya wrote: > > > From: Linu Cherian > > > > > > Add SMMUv3 model definition for ThunderX2. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Linu Cherian > > > Signed-off-by: Geetha Sowjanya > > > > This is an ACPICA change, but you have not included the ACPICA maintainers > > into your original CC list (added now). > > > > Bob, Lv, how should this be routed? > > > > Do you want to apply this patch upstream first or can we make this change in > > Linux and upstream in parallel? That shouldn't be a big deal, right? > > I think we're still waiting for the updated IORT document to be published (I > think this should be in the next week or so), so I don't think we should > commit the new ID before that happens. OK, thanks for the heads-up. I think it's better to submit the actbl2.h update directly to ACPICA upstream when the doc is published and then work on top of that. Thanks, Rafael