From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshan.ljs@antgroup.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 00/11] rcu/x86: Use per-cpu rcu preempt count
Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 13:03:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <363efc75-7ebf-408d-be2d-e6c579674f44@paulmck-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240407090558.3395-1-jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
On Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 05:05:47PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> From: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshan.ljs@antgroup.com>
>
>
> Changed from v1:
> Merge thunk_64.S and thunk_32.S into thunk.S
> Add missing #ifdef in arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
>
> X86 can access percpu data in a single instruction.
>
> Use per-cpu rcu preempt count and make it able to be inlined.
>
> patch 1-8: prepare
> patch 9-11: implement PCPU_RCU_PREEMPT_COUNT
>
> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Hello, Lai!
This is really cool stuff, thank you!!!
Two big questions remain: (1) What system-level net performance benefit
is there, taking the increased context-switch overhead into account and
(2) Are the scheduler maintainers on board with these changes?
On #1, I do well recall your ca. 2019 points about the improved code
generated, but I have seen cases where improved code actually ran
more slowly. My guess is that you have the best chance of seeing
system-level benefits on low-end x86 platforms, perhaps the old Atom
or Celeron systems. The rcuref module provides a good way of doing
microbenchmarks, which would be a good start. Other metrics that
might help include overall kernel code size.
On #2, good data for #1 would help greatly.
Thoughts?
Thanx, Paul
> Lai Jiangshan (11):
> lib: Use rcu_preempt_depth() to replace current->rcu_read_lock_nesting
> rcu: Move rcu_preempt_depth_set() to rcupdate.h
> rcu: Reorder tree_exp.h after tree_plugin.h
> rcu: Add macros set_rcu_preempt_special() and
> clear_rcu_preempt_special()
> rcu: Make rcu_read_unlock_special() global
> rcu: Rename marco __LINUX_RCU_H to __KERNEL_RCU_H
> sched/core: Add rcu_preempt_switch()
> x86/entry: Merge thunk_64.S and thunk_32.S into thunk.S
> rcu: Implement PCPU_RCU_PREEMPT_COUNT framework
> x86/rcu: Add rcu_preempt_count
> x86/rcu: Add THUNK rcu_read_unlock_special_thunk
>
> arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/x86/entry/Makefile | 2 +-
> arch/x86/entry/{thunk_64.S => thunk.S} | 5 ++
> arch/x86/entry/thunk_32.S | 18 ----
> arch/x86/include/asm/current.h | 3 +
> arch/x86/include/asm/rcu_preempt.h | 109 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 4 +
> include/linux/rcupdate.h | 36 ++++++++
> kernel/rcu/Kconfig | 8 ++
> kernel/rcu/rcu.h | 15 +++-
> kernel/rcu/tree.c | 2 +-
> kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h | 2 +-
> kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 41 ++++++----
> kernel/sched/core.c | 2 +
> lib/locking-selftest.c | 6 +-
> 15 files changed, 212 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
> rename arch/x86/entry/{thunk_64.S => thunk.S} (72%)
> delete mode 100644 arch/x86/entry/thunk_32.S
> create mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/rcu_preempt.h
>
>
> base-commit: f2f80ac809875855ac843f9e5e7480604b5cbff5
> --
> 2.19.1.6.gb485710b
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-20 20:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-07 9:05 Lai Jiangshan
2024-04-07 9:05 ` [PATCH V2 01/11] lib: Use rcu_preempt_depth() to replace current->rcu_read_lock_nesting Lai Jiangshan
2024-04-07 9:05 ` [PATCH V2 02/11] rcu: Move rcu_preempt_depth_set() to rcupdate.h Lai Jiangshan
2024-04-07 9:05 ` [PATCH V2 03/11] rcu: Reorder tree_exp.h after tree_plugin.h Lai Jiangshan
2024-04-23 17:58 ` Joel Fernandes
2024-04-24 2:47 ` Lai Jiangshan
2024-04-07 9:05 ` [PATCH V2 04/11] rcu: Add macros set_rcu_preempt_special() and clear_rcu_preempt_special() Lai Jiangshan
2024-04-07 9:05 ` [PATCH V2 05/11] rcu: Make rcu_read_unlock_special() global Lai Jiangshan
2024-04-07 9:05 ` [PATCH V2 06/11] rcu: Rename marco __LINUX_RCU_H to __KERNEL_RCU_H Lai Jiangshan
2024-04-07 9:05 ` [PATCH V2 07/11] sched/core: Add rcu_preempt_switch() Lai Jiangshan
2024-04-07 9:05 ` [PATCH V2 08/11] x86/entry: Merge thunk_64.S and thunk_32.S into thunk.S Lai Jiangshan
2024-04-09 8:27 ` [tip: x86/entry] " tip-bot2 for Lai Jiangshan
2024-04-07 9:05 ` [PATCH V2 09/11] rcu: Implement PCPU_RCU_PREEMPT_COUNT framework Lai Jiangshan
2024-04-23 18:19 ` Joel Fernandes
2024-04-24 3:02 ` Lai Jiangshan
2024-04-07 9:05 ` [PATCH V2 10/11] x86/rcu: Add rcu_preempt_count Lai Jiangshan
2024-04-23 18:09 ` Joel Fernandes
2024-04-24 2:53 ` Lai Jiangshan
2024-04-07 9:05 ` [PATCH V2 11/11] x86/rcu: Add THUNK rcu_read_unlock_special_thunk Lai Jiangshan
2024-04-23 17:26 ` Joel Fernandes
2024-04-24 2:43 ` Lai Jiangshan
2024-05-20 20:03 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=363efc75-7ebf-408d-be2d-e6c579674f44@paulmck-laptop \
--to=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=jiangshan.ljs@antgroup.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®