mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com, ltp-list <ltp-list@lists.sf.net>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [LTP] [ANNOUNCE] The Linux Test Project has been Released for  OCTOBER 2009
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 14:03:30 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <364299f40911061403ied57cc5w2120a8ea8c9a8c72@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <364299f40911061339x7b689d3cw705674bd9b332e5c@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:
>> Subrata Modak <subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
>>>
>>> ========================
>>> OCTOBER 2009 Highlights:
>>
>> s/High/Low/
>>
>>> ========================
>>>      1. LTP Makefiles rewrite:(Project started 1.2 years back)
>>>              I. To accommodate correct build/installation practices,
>>>             II. better integrate Autoconf/Automake with tests for safer
>>>                 builds,
>>>            III. better cross-compilation of LTP sources.
>>
>> Just as a warning for everyone: that change broke building on most old
>> distributions and there seems to be no interest in fixing that.
>>
>> Unless you're running the latest and greatest better stay with older LTP
>> versions.
>
> Andi,
>    Let's keep this discussion on track with the other thread that's
> open. We can probably come to an engineering solution that will allow
> your version of make (3.80) to function, but I think that a line needs
> to be drawn in the sand at that version because make 3.79 is too
> ancient (~7 years old) to work with.

    Andi and Arjen did make a valid point in the other thread. If you
do not have access to make 3.81, please avoid this release. I will
work on filling in the gaps for 3.80 to function, but users with make
3.79 will need to upgrade to either 3.80 or 3.81.
Thanks,
-Garrett

      reply	other threads:[~2009-11-06 22:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-02 13:17 Subrata Modak
     [not found] ` <87iqdn76jg.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>
2009-11-06 21:03   ` [LTP] " Mike Frysinger
2009-11-06 21:39   ` Garrett Cooper
2009-11-06 22:03     ` Garrett Cooper [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=364299f40911061403ied57cc5w2120a8ea8c9a8c72@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=yanegomi@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ltp-list@lists.sf.net \
    --cc=subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®