From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752498AbdDLFUK (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Apr 2017 01:20:10 -0400 Received: from fllnx209.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.16]:11638 "EHLO fllnx209.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750899AbdDLFUH (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Apr 2017 01:20:07 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/32] mfd: exynos-lpass: Use common soc/exynos-regs-pmu.h header To: Lee Jones References: <20170410131823.26485-1-kishon@ti.com> <20170410131823.26485-2-kishon@ti.com> <20170411141407.ghpln5u5re5erqud@dell> <3268f5fd-218f-21d4-cc19-39812b58b8ea@ti.com> <20170411163438.yhbe22v34d7chit3@dell> CC: , From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I Message-ID: <364bec43-381d-6e8c-0050-1a0dbf0d2655@ti.com> Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 10:49:27 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170411163438.yhbe22v34d7chit3@dell> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Tuesday 11 April 2017 10:04 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > On Tue, 11 Apr 2017, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On Tuesday 11 April 2017 07:44 PM, Lee Jones wrote: >>> On Mon, 10 Apr 2017, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >>> >>>> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski >>>> >>>> The MFD-specific header will go away because it duplicates defines from >>>> exynos-regs-pmu.h. >>>> >>>> Reported-by: kbuild test robot >>>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski >>>> Reviewed-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz >>>> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones >>> >>> >>> Okay, this is confusing. >>> >>> I'm guessing you're sending this to Greg for inclusion into -stable? >> >> No, it's not for stable. It's for 4.12. > > Then I'm totally confused, since this patch has already been applied, > which is obvious since I already signed it off? With your immutable branch applied to phy tree, it's going to be part of my pull request too. > >>> Isn't there a way to specify this intention? >> >> The pull request (cover letter) specifies this intention. > > Great! But you forgot to send it to me, doh! > > Why are you sending patches with a pull-request? Greg KH sometimes would like to take a look at the patches that are part of the pull request. I've been practicing it for a long time. > >>> Also, patch 1 and 3 appear to be identical. >>> >>> Not even sure how that's possible. > > Still have no idea how you managed to do this! I think first it got applied when I applied patches from local-next to next and then I did a merge of your immutable branch. Thanks Kishon