From: Hui Su <sh_def@163.com>
To: Kayra Cizmeci <kayracizmeci@gmail.com>
Cc: arighi@nvidia.com, bsegall@google.com, connoro@google.com,
dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, jstultz@google.com,
juri.lelli@redhat.com, kprateek.nayak@amd.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mgorman@suse.de, mingo@redhat.com,
peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
sched-ext@lists.linux.dev, soolaugust@gmail.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, vschneid@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] sched: Dispatch task ticks for donor and execution classes
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2026 22:07:24 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <36503a3fb742ca20fa218ec190a50932.sh_def@163.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260913120814.1273086-1-kayracizmeci@gmail.com>
Hi Kayra,
> Wouldn't it be better to merge this patch and it's use case together?
>
> The commit message is confusing too "Scheduler ticks therefore need to
> reach both the class which owns the scheduling context and the class which
> owns the execution context." But the patch doesn't do this on it's own.
You are right that patch 1 alone does not enable useful execution-context
work in the FAIR callback: the callback is still donor-gated there, so a FAIR
callback reached only as the execution class returns without doing FAIR
scheduling work.
That is intentional. I split the series so that patch 1 is a
behavior-preserving conversion of the sched_class::task_tick() interface and
the common dispatcher:
- patch 1: generic donor/execution callback dispatch
- patch 2: move NUMA tick work to the execution context
- patch 3: move cache tick work to the execution context
Keeping patch 1 donor-gated makes the API and dispatcher change independently
reviewable, while patches 2 and 3 introduce the execution-context users.
I agree that the patch 1 commit message is confusing because its opening
paragraph can read as if patch 1 itself already enables useful
execution-context tick work. I will reword it to make the preparatory nature
explicit, for example:
This patch adds the common donor/execution task_tick() dispatcher and
updates the callback interface. Class-specific tick work remains
donor-owned here; subsequent patches use the new dispatch path for
execution-context NUMA and cache work.
I would prefer to keep patch 1 separate from patch 2 for now. It keeps the
sched_class::task_tick() interface conversion and cross-class dispatcher
separate from the NUMA semantic fix, and keeps the NUMA and cache fixes as
separate changes with their own Fixes: tags. If there is a preference for
introducing the dispatcher together with its first execution-context user,
I can fold patch 2 into patch 1.
Thanks,
Hui
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-13 13:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-13 6:47 [PATCH v5 0/4] sched: Handle split scheduling and execution contexts in task ticks Hui Su
2026-09-13 6:47 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] sched: Dispatch task ticks for donor and execution classes Hui Su
2026-09-13 12:08 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-09-13 13:07 ` Hui Su [this message]
2026-09-13 6:47 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] sched/numa: Drive NUMA task tick from execution context Hui Su
2026-09-13 6:47 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] sched/cache: Drive cache " Hui Su
2026-09-13 6:47 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] sched/core: Fix donor slice accounting under proxy execution Hui Su
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=36503a3fb742ca20fa218ec190a50932.sh_def@163.com \
--to=sh_def@163.com \
--cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=connoro@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=jstultz@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kayracizmeci@gmail.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=soolaugust@gmail.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®