From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264873AbUEYO1u (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 May 2004 10:27:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264876AbUEYO1u (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 May 2004 10:27:50 -0400 Received: from e4.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.104]:55938 "EHLO e4.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264873AbUEYO1r (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 May 2004 10:27:47 -0400 Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 07:27:40 -0700 From: "Martin J. Bligh" To: FabF , lkml Subject: Re: 2.6.7rc1 vs 2.6.0 Message-ID: <367240000.1085495259@[10.10.2.4]> In-Reply-To: <1085464727.3762.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1085464727.3762.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.2.1 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Here's trivial fgrep vs report (using ffb1) : > > 2.6.7rc1 : > Grepping /usr/bin : > 45% cpu - 38.06 RT Sec - 1.10 Sec in KM > Entries scanned : 1527 > 85112 Kb analyzed this time > > 2.6.0 : > Grepping /usr/bin : > 51% cpu - 33.12 RT Sec - 1.10 Sec in KM > Entries scanned :1527 > 85112 Kb analyzed this time > > This is done against ext3 fs. Same .config, same box, same box state. > What relevance could explain this 5s delta ? IOW, what big ext3, mm new functionnalities have been plugged in-between ? Take kernel profiles of both (see Documentation/basic_profiling.txt) M.