From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262513AbTDHXBY (for ); Tue, 8 Apr 2003 19:01:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262515AbTDHXBY (for ); Tue, 8 Apr 2003 19:01:24 -0400 Received: from magic-mail.adaptec.com ([208.236.45.100]:61406 "EHLO magic.adaptec.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262513AbTDHXBX (for ); Tue, 8 Apr 2003 19:01:23 -0400 Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2003 17:12:39 -0600 From: "Justin T. Gibbs" Reply-To: "Justin T. Gibbs" To: James Bottomley cc: Alan Cox , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] aic7* claims all checked EISA io ranges Message-ID: <3688420000.1049843559@aslan.btc.adaptec.com> In-Reply-To: <1049843229.2107.46.camel@mulgrave> References: <1049843229.2107.46.camel@mulgrave> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.0.2 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > I take it 2.5 is up to date, right? Because otherwise we should have > seen an update notice go across linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org. In the past, I have sent mail directly to Linus which has worked for 2.5. Unfortunately, it looks like he has not applied the last bundle I posted to him on 2003/03/25. This is the same bk output as posted on my website. > This problem looks to be present in 2.5, so should I apply the patch? It would be better to just upgrade the driver with bits I submitted to Linus. I have another update coming to correctly fix the del_timer_sync() issue since the last, unsanctioned, change in this area has a large potential to cause a deadlock. -- Justin