From: Denis Benato <benato.denis96@gmail.com>
To: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
"Limonciello, Mario" <mario.limonciello@amd.com>,
"Luke D . Jones" <luke@ljones.dev>,
Alok Tiwari <alok.a.tiwari@oracle.com>,
Derek John Clark <derekjohn.clark@gmail.com>,
Mateusz Schyboll <dragonn@op.pl>,
porfet828@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 4/9] platform/x86: asus-armoury: add apu-mem control support
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2025 03:23:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3691edd4-7d04-42c5-9f5f-8f57a4da2740@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <61c69499-fb69-0642-915d-e3072d2dbd21@linux.intel.com>
On 10/17/25 14:16, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Oct 2025, Denis Benato wrote:
>
>> From: "Luke D. Jones" <luke@ljones.dev>
>>
>> Implement the APU memory size control under the asus-armoury module using
>> the fw_attributes class.
>>
>> This allows the APU allocated memory size to be adjusted depending on
>> the users priority. A reboot is required after change.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Luke D. Jones <luke@ljones.dev>
>> Signed-off-by: Denis Benato <benato.denis96@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/platform/x86/asus-armoury.c | 81 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>> include/linux/platform_data/x86/asus-wmi.h | 2 +
>> 2 files changed, 83 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/asus-armoury.c b/drivers/platform/x86/asus-armoury.c
>> index 68ce2c159ae1..3b49a27e397d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/asus-armoury.c
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/asus-armoury.c
>> @@ -394,6 +394,86 @@ static ssize_t egpu_enable_current_value_store(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj
>> WMI_SHOW_INT(egpu_enable_current_value, "%d\n", ASUS_WMI_DEVID_EGPU);
>> ATTR_GROUP_BOOL_CUSTOM(egpu_enable, "egpu_enable", "Enable the eGPU (also disables dGPU)");
>>
>> +/* Device memory available to APU */
>> +
>> +/* Values map for APU memory: some looks out of order but are actually correct */
>> +static u32 apu_mem_map[] = {
>> + [0] = 0x000, /* called "AUTO" on the BIOS, is the minimum available */
>> + [1] = 0x102,
>> + [2] = 0x103,
>> + [3] = 0x104,
>> + [4] = 0x105,
>> + [5] = 0x107,
>> + [6] = 0x108,
>> + [7] = 0x109,
>> + [8] = 0x106,
> Is BIT(8) actually telling non-AUTO here? I mean, it's not set for the
> AUTO case. If it has this special meaning, maybe that should be left out
> of this array and handled by the show/store functions as it seems
> different for the auto depending on which way the information is being
> passed.
When 0x000 is set the interface will answer with value 0x100,
so it seems a bit confusing associating BIT(8) to "non-auto".
Honestly I don't see any particular pattern around these values.
I have tried to see if I could set 0x100 or 0x101 and my hardware
stopped booting until a hard reset was performed.
I am not seeing any particular reason to further modify code here.
>> +};
>> +
>> +static ssize_t apu_mem_current_value_show(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr,
>> + char *buf)
>> +{
>> + int err;
>> + u32 mem;
>> +
>> + err = asus_wmi_get_devstate_dsts(ASUS_WMI_DEVID_APU_MEM, &mem);
>> + if (err)
>> + return err;
>> +
>> + if ((mem & ASUS_WMI_DSTS_PRESENCE_BIT) == 0)
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> +
>> + mem &= ~ASUS_WMI_DSTS_PRESENCE_BIT;
>> +
>> + /* After 0x000 is set, a read will return 0x100 */
>> + if (mem == 0x100)
>> + return sysfs_emit(buf, "0\n");
>> +
>> + for (unsigned int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(apu_mem_map); i++) {
>> + if (apu_mem_map[i] == mem)
>> + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n", i);
>> + }
>> +
>> + pr_warn("Unrecognised value for APU mem 0x%08x\n", mem);
>> + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n", mem);
> ??
>
> Should this return -EIO or something like that instead. It definitely
> looks wrong to first log it as %x and then output to sysfs as %u.
>
>> +}
>> +
>> +static ssize_t apu_mem_current_value_store(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr,
>> + const char *buf, size_t count)
>> +{
>> + int result, err;
>> + u32 requested, mem;
>> +
>> + result = kstrtou32(buf, 10, &requested);
>> + if (result)
>> + return result;
>> +
>> + if (requested >= ARRAY_SIZE(apu_mem_map))
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + mem = apu_mem_map[requested];
>> +
>> + err = asus_wmi_set_devstate(ASUS_WMI_DEVID_APU_MEM, mem, &result);
>> + if (err) {
>> + pr_warn("Failed to set apu_mem: %d\n", err);
>> + return err;
>> + }
>> +
>> + pr_info("APU memory changed to %uGB, reboot required\n", requested+1);
> requested + 1
>
> Please mention GB up where the array is.
>
>> + sysfs_notify(kobj, NULL, attr->attr.name);
>> +
>> + asus_set_reboot_and_signal_event();
>> +
>> + return count;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static ssize_t apu_mem_possible_values_show(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr,
>> + char *buf)
>> +{
>> + BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(apu_mem_map) != 9);
>> + return sysfs_emit(buf, "0;1;2;3;4;5;6;7;8\n");
> You could make this future proof with a for loop and sysfs_emit_at() and
> drop the BUILD_BUG_ON(). Maybe all these multi-valued show functions could
> share a helper which does that.
Thanks, due to changes to egpu interface I will introduce such helper in 0/2.
>> +}
>> +ATTR_GROUP_ENUM_CUSTOM(apu_mem, "apu_mem", "Set available system RAM (in GB) for the APU to use");
>> +
>> /* Simple attribute creation */
>> ATTR_GROUP_ENUM_INT_RO(charge_mode, "charge_mode", ASUS_WMI_DEVID_CHARGE_MODE, "0;1;2",
>> "Show the current mode of charging");
>> @@ -414,6 +494,7 @@ static const struct asus_attr_group armoury_attr_groups[] = {
>> { &egpu_connected_attr_group, ASUS_WMI_DEVID_EGPU_CONNECTED },
>> { &egpu_enable_attr_group, ASUS_WMI_DEVID_EGPU },
>> { &dgpu_disable_attr_group, ASUS_WMI_DEVID_DGPU },
>> + { &apu_mem_attr_group, ASUS_WMI_DEVID_APU_MEM },
>>
>> { &charge_mode_attr_group, ASUS_WMI_DEVID_CHARGE_MODE },
>> { &boot_sound_attr_group, ASUS_WMI_DEVID_BOOT_SOUND },
>> diff --git a/include/linux/platform_data/x86/asus-wmi.h b/include/linux/platform_data/x86/asus-wmi.h
>> index 10acd5d52e38..a4f6bab93a6f 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/platform_data/x86/asus-wmi.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/platform_data/x86/asus-wmi.h
>> @@ -137,6 +137,8 @@
>> /* dgpu on/off */
>> #define ASUS_WMI_DEVID_DGPU 0x00090020
>>
>> +#define ASUS_WMI_DEVID_APU_MEM 0x000600C1
>> +
>> /* gpu mux switch, 0 = dGPU, 1 = Optimus */
>> #define ASUS_WMI_DEVID_GPU_MUX 0x00090016
>> #define ASUS_WMI_DEVID_GPU_MUX_VIVO 0x00090026
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-18 1:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-15 1:47 [PATCH v14 0/9] platform/x86: Add asus-armoury driver Denis Benato
2025-10-15 1:47 ` [PATCH v14 1/9] platform/x86: asus-wmi: export symbols used for read/write WMI Denis Benato
2025-10-15 13:03 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-10-15 1:47 ` [PATCH v14 2/9] platform/x86: asus-armoury: move existing tunings to asus-armoury module Denis Benato
2025-10-15 13:56 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-10-16 1:28 ` Denis Benato
2025-10-15 1:47 ` [PATCH v14 3/9] platform/x86: asus-armoury: add panel_hd_mode attribute Denis Benato
2025-10-15 1:47 ` [PATCH v14 4/9] platform/x86: asus-armoury: add apu-mem control support Denis Benato
2025-10-17 12:16 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-10-18 1:23 ` Denis Benato [this message]
2025-10-15 1:47 ` [PATCH v14 5/9] platform/x86: asus-armoury: add core count control Denis Benato
2025-10-15 14:11 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-10-17 12:48 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-10-18 1:43 ` Denis Benato
2025-10-20 17:15 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-10-20 17:37 ` Denis Benato
2025-10-20 18:45 ` Mario Limonciello (AMD) (kernel.org)
2025-10-19 16:53 ` Denis Benato
2025-10-15 1:47 ` [PATCH v14 6/9] platform/x86: asus-armoury: add screen auto-brightness toggle Denis Benato
2025-10-15 1:47 ` [PATCH v14 7/9] platform/x86: asus-wmi: deprecate bios features Denis Benato
2025-10-17 12:54 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-10-15 1:47 ` [PATCH v14 8/9] platform/x86: asus-wmi: rename ASUS_WMI_DEVID_PPT_FPPT Denis Benato
2025-10-17 12:59 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-10-15 1:47 ` [PATCH v14 9/9] platform/x86: asus-armoury: add ppt_* and nv_* tuning knobs Denis Benato
2025-10-17 13:09 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-10-15 5:13 ` [PATCH v14 0/9] platform/x86: Add asus-armoury driver Mario Limonciello
2025-10-15 9:38 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-10-15 12:00 ` Denis Benato
2025-10-15 12:06 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-10-15 12:27 ` Denis Benato
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3691edd4-7d04-42c5-9f5f-8f57a4da2740@gmail.com \
--to=benato.denis96@gmail.com \
--cc=alok.a.tiwari@oracle.com \
--cc=derekjohn.clark@gmail.com \
--cc=dragonn@op.pl \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luke@ljones.dev \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=porfet828@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®