Re: [RESEND PATCH 2/2] iommu/iova: allocate iova_rcache->depot dynamicly

["zhangzekun (A)" <zhangzekun11@huawei.com>]

在 2023/8/11 22:14, John Garry 写道:
> On 11/08/2023 14:02, Zhang Zekun wrote:
>> In fio test with 4k,read,and allowed cpus to 0-255, we observe a 
>> performance
>> decrease of IOPS. The normal IOPS 
>
> What do you mean by normal IOPS? Describe this "normal" scenario.
>
Hi, John

The reason why I think 1980K is normal is that I have test the iova_rache
hit rate with all iova size, the average iova cache hit rate can reach up to
around 99% (varys from diffent work loads and iova size), and I think
iova_rcache behave well in our test work loads. Besides, the IOPS is
behaving as expect which is acked by our test group.

> ? can reach up to 1980k, but we can only
>> get about 1600k.
>>
>> abormal IOPS:
>> Jobs: 12 (f=12): [R(12)][99.3%][r=6220MiB/s][r=1592k IOPS][eta 00m:12s]
>> Jobs: 12 (f=12): [R(12)][99.4%][r=6215MiB/s][r=1591k IOPS][eta 00m:11s]
>> Jobs: 12 (f=12): [R(12)][99.4%][r=6335MiB/s][r=1622k IOPS][eta 00m:10s]
>> Jobs: 12 (f=12): [R(12)][99.5%][r=6194MiB/s][r=1586k IOPS][eta 00m:09s]
>> Jobs: 12 (f=12): [R(12)][99.6%][r=6173MiB/s][r=1580k IOPS][eta 00m:08s]
>> Jobs: 12 (f=12): [R(12)][99.6%][r=5984MiB/s][r=1532k IOPS][eta 00m:07s]
>> Jobs: 12 (f=12): [R(12)][99.7%][r=6374MiB/s][r=1632k IOPS][eta 00m:06s]
>> Jobs: 12 (f=12): [R(12)][99.7%][r=6343MiB/s][r=1624k IOPS][eta 00m:05s]
>>
>> normal IOPS:
>> Jobs: 12 (f=12): [R(12)][99.3%][r=7736MiB/s][r=1980k IOPS][eta 00m:12s]
>> Jobs: 12 (f=12): [R(12)][99.4%][r=7744MiB/s][r=1982k IOPS][eta 00m:11s]
>> Jobs: 12 (f=12): [R(12)][99.4%][r=7737MiB/s][r=1981k IOPS][eta 00m:10s]
>> Jobs: 12 (f=12): [R(12)][99.5%][r=7735MiB/s][r=1980k IOPS][eta 00m:09s]
>> Jobs: 12 (f=12): [R(12)][99.6%][r=7741MiB/s][r=1982k IOPS][eta 00m:08s]
>> Jobs: 12 (f=12): [R(12)][99.6%][r=7740MiB/s][r=1982k IOPS][eta 00m:07s]
>> Jobs: 12 (f=12): [R(12)][99.7%][r=7736MiB/s][r=1981k IOPS][eta 00m:06s]
>> Jobs: 12 (f=12): [R(12)][99.7%][r=7736MiB/s][r=1980k IOPS][eta 00m:05s]
>>
>> The current struct of iova_rcache will have iova_cpu_rcache for every
>> cpu, and these iova_cpu_rcaches use a common buffer 
>> iova_rcache->depot to
>> exchange iovas among iova_cpu_rcaches. A machine with 256 cpus will have
>> 256 iova_cpu_rcaches and 1 iova_rcache->depot per iova_domain. However,
>> the max size of iova_rcache->depot is fixed to MAX_GLOBAL_MAGS which 
>> equals
>> to 32, and can't grow with the number of cpus, and this can cause 
>> problem
>> in some condition.
>>
>> Some drivers will only free iovas in their irq call back function. For
>> the driver in this case it has 16 thread irqs to free iova, but these
>> irq call back function will only free iovas on 16 certain cpus(cpu{0,16,
>> 32...,240}). Thread irq which smp affinity is 0-15, will only free 
>> iova on
>> cpu 0. However, the driver will alloc iova on all cpus(cpu{0-255}), cpus
>> without free iova in local cpu_rcache need to get free iovas from
>> iova_rcache->depot. The current size of iova_rcache->depot max size 
>> is 32,
>> and it seems to be too small for 256 users (16 cpus will put iovas to
>> iova_rcache->depot and 240 cpus will try to get iova from it). Set
>> iova_rcache->depot grow with the num of possible cpus, and the decrease
>> of IOPS disappear.
>
> Doesn't it take a long time for all the depots to fill for you? From 
> the description, this sounds like the hisilicon SAS controller which 
> you are experimenting with and I found there that it took a long time 
> for the depots to fill for high throughput testing.
>
> Thanks,
> John

Yes, it will take more time to fill rcahe->depot, but we don't need to fill
all depots before using iova in them. We can use iova in rcache->depot
when local cpu_rcache is empty and there are iova magazines in
rcache->depot, which means "rcache->depot_size > 0". The larger depot
size will help caching more iova magazines freed in __iova_rcache_insert()
which means more potential memory cost for iova_rcache, and should not
introduce performance issues.