From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1755814AbeEHUh5 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Tue, 8 May 2018 16:37:57 -0400
Received: from mail-io0-f175.google.com ([209.85.223.175]:35621 "EHLO
        mail-io0-f175.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1755775AbeEHUhz (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 8 May 2018 16:37:55 -0400
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZp7BD17D0iN4D2Zs6pZX1k1C+82cCifqTbyEzf84PnB6tXe2IGBdBYxANf+HmFWvjmOhU0f1Q==
Subject: Re: bug in tag handling in blk-mq?
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
        Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
        linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name>
References: <999DF2B3-4EE8-4BDF-89C5-EB0C2D8BF69E@linaro.org>
 <7760d23b-7a4c-a645-1c7a-da7569bb44dc@kernel.dk>
 <84145CD7-B917-4B32-8A5C-310C1910DB71@linaro.org>
 <1525755090.24338.1.camel@gmx.de> <1525768632.5208.4.camel@gmx.de>
 <ffd0c030-43f8-0dbe-42b3-03bb9c410bea@kernel.dk>
 <1525797766.5204.2.camel@gmx.de>
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Message-ID: <3692ce7d-a767-72e6-65ae-6178b6c2e7d8@kernel.dk>
Date: Tue, 8 May 2018 14:37:52 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1525797766.5204.2.camel@gmx.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 5/8/18 10:42 AM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-05-08 at 08:55 -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>
>> All the block debug files are empty...
> 
> Sigh.  Take 2, this time cat debug files, having turned block tracing
> off before doing anything else (so trace bits in dmesg.txt should end
> AT the stall).

OK, that's better. What I see from the traces:

- You have regular IO and some non-fs IO (from scsi_execute()). This mix
  may be key.

- sdd has nothing pending, yet has 6 active waitqueues.

I'm going to see if I can reproduce this. Paolo, what kind of attempts
to reproduce this have you done?

-- 
Jens Axboe