From: Jeff Hugo <jeff.hugo@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Alexandra Lu <alexandra.lu@nokia.com>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>
Cc: Vivek Pernamitta <vivek.pernamitta@oss.qualcomm.com>,
mhi@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bus: mhi: host: pci_generic: Fix runtime PM imbalance for no_m3 devices
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2026 14:04:46 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <369f1fa7-1849-4164-8b72-c27b00329b06@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260807143353.1932381-1-alexandra.lu@nokia.com>
On 8/7/2026 8:33 AM, Alexandra Lu wrote:
> mhi_pci_probe() drops the runtime PM reference taken by local_pci_probe()
> only when the device supports both PME from D3hot and M3, but
> mhi_pci_remove() re-takes it based on PME capability alone, without
> checking no_m3.
>
> For a device that is PME capable and has no_m3 set, probe therefore never
> drops the reference while remove takes an extra one, leaving the runtime
> PM usage count one higher after every bind/unbind cycle. That is benign
> for the device being removed, since the PCI core resumes it to D0 on
> unbind regardless, but the struct device outlives the binding, so the
> count accumulates across repeated cycles and can end up preventing
> runtime suspend altogether.
>
> Cache no_m3 in the driver's private data, as is already done for
> reset_on_remove, and gate the removal side on it as well. Unlike
> reset_on_remove it is cached for virtual functions too, because the probe
> side gate tests info->no_m3 for physical and virtual functions alike.
>
> QDU100 is currently the only device that sets no_m3.
>
> Fixes: 0494cf9793b7 ("bus: mhi: host: pci_generic: Disable runtime PM for QDU100")
> Assisted-by: Cursor:claude-opus-5
> Signed-off-by: Alexandra Lu <alexandra.lu@nokia.com>
Seems sane to me.
Reviewed-by: Jeff Hugo <jeff.hugo@oss.qualcomm.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-14 20:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-07 14:33 Alexandra Lu
2026-08-14 20:04 ` Jeff Hugo [this message]
2026-08-15 6:23 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-09-26 10:18 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=369f1fa7-1849-4164-8b72-c27b00329b06@oss.qualcomm.com \
--to=jeff.hugo@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=alexandra.lu@nokia.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=mhi@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vivek.pernamitta@oss.qualcomm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®