From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
To: Runyu Xiao <runyu.xiao@seu.edu.cn>
Cc: agk@redhat.com, snitzer@kernel.org, dm-devel@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
jianhao.xu@seu.edu.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dm-crypt: unlock allocation mutex before retry
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2026 11:46:29 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <36ae1bb3-09ad-77a2-15fb-4fa76208ad0c@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260809051839.3504080-1-runyu.xiao@seu.edu.cn>
On Sun, 9 Aug 2026, Runyu Xiao wrote:
> If the initial GFP_NOWAIT page allocation fails, crypt_alloc_buffer()
> sets __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM and retries while holding bio_alloc_lock. If a
> later page allocation fails, the retry edge bypasses the common unlock and
> reacquires the same mutex. This can deadlock the dm-crypt I/O path and
> leave I/O for the affected mapping stalled.
Hi
When __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM is set, mempool_alloc can't return NULL. So, the
bug can't happen.
Mikulas
> Release the mutex before retrying, but only when this attempt took the
> direct-reclaim path; the first attempt did not acquire it.
>
> This issue was identified by a static-analysis checker and manually
> confirmed by following the retry control flow in v6.1.66 and current
> mainline. A source-level control-flow check verified the vulnerable
> ordering and the unlock-before-retry ordering after this change. A small
> POSIX-thread model checked only the mutex re-acquisition condition; it does
> not exercise dm-crypt.
>
> Fixes: 7145c241a1bf ("dm crypt: avoid deadlock in mempools")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Runyu Xiao <runyu.xiao@seu.edu.cn>
> ---
> drivers/md/dm-crypt.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-crypt.c b/drivers/md/dm-crypt.c
> index 608b617fb817..aabb9a5f85a7 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/dm-crypt.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/dm-crypt.c
> @@ -1674,6 +1674,8 @@ static struct bio *crypt_alloc_buffer(struct dm_crypt_io *io, unsigned int size)
> if (!pages) {
> crypt_free_buffer_pages(cc, clone);
> bio_put(clone);
> + if (unlikely(gfp_mask & __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM))
> + mutex_unlock(&cc->bio_alloc_lock);
> gfp_mask |= __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM;
> order = 0;
> goto retry;
> --
> 2.34.1
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-10 9:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-09 5:18 Runyu Xiao
2026-08-09 13:20 ` Bart Van Assche
2026-08-11 3:14 ` [PATCH v2] dm-crypt: refactor buffer allocation retry handling Runyu Xiao
2026-08-11 11:55 ` Mikulas Patocka
2026-08-11 14:08 ` Runyu Xiao
2026-08-10 9:46 ` Mikulas Patocka [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=36ae1bb3-09ad-77a2-15fb-4fa76208ad0c@redhat.com \
--to=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jianhao.xu@seu.edu.cn \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=runyu.xiao@seu.edu.cn \
--cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®