From: Jiaqing Zhao <jiaqing.zhao@linux.intel.com>
To: Paul Fertser <fercerpav@gmail.com>
Cc: Samuel Mendoza-Jonas <sam@mendozajonas.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/ncsi: Add Intel OS2BMC OEM command
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 10:12:06 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <36c12486-57d4-c11d-474f-f26a7de8e59a@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yxrun9LRcFv2QntR@home.paul.comp>
On 2022-09-09 15:43, Paul Fertser wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2022 at 03:34:53PM +0800, Jiaqing Zhao wrote:
>>> Can you please outline some particular use cases for this feature?
>>>
>> It enables access between host and BMC when BMC shares the network connection
>> with host using NCSI, like accessing BMC via HTTP or SSH from host.
>
> Why having a compile time kernel option here more appropriate than
> just running something like "/usr/bin/ncsi-netlink --package 0
> --channel 0 --index 3 --oem-payload 00000157200001" (this example uses
> another OEM command) on BMC userspace startup?
>
Using ncsi-netlink is one way, but the package and channel id is undetermined
as it is selected at runtime. Calling the netlink command on a nonexistent
package/channel may lead to kernel panic.
Why I prefer the kernel option is that it applies the config to all ncsi
devices by default when setting up them. This reduces the effort and keeps
compatibility. Lots of things in current ncsi kernel driver can be done via
commands from userspace, but I think it is not a good idea to have a driver
resides on both kernel and userspace.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-13 2:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-09 2:57 Jiaqing Zhao
2022-09-09 5:59 ` Paul Fertser
2022-09-09 7:34 ` Jiaqing Zhao
2022-09-09 7:43 ` Paul Fertser
2022-09-13 2:12 ` Jiaqing Zhao [this message]
2022-09-13 13:35 ` Sam Mendoza-Jonas
2022-09-14 1:10 ` Jiaqing Zhao
2022-09-15 15:43 ` Paul Fertser
2022-09-19 8:06 ` Jiaqing Zhao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=36c12486-57d4-c11d-474f-f26a7de8e59a@linux.intel.com \
--to=jiaqing.zhao@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fercerpav@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sam@mendozajonas.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome