From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C597FECAAD5 for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2022 06:51:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230516AbiIHGvO (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Sep 2022 02:51:14 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55880 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231174AbiIHGuu (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Sep 2022 02:50:50 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 658F1BD1D9 for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2022 23:50:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F15E1D6E; Wed, 7 Sep 2022 23:50:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.162] (unknown [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3E9273F7B4; Wed, 7 Sep 2022 23:51:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <36cd651f-40d5-91b7-c638-37e65a55fc74@arm.com> Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2022 08:50:09 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.1 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] sched/pelt: Introduce PELT multiplier Content-Language: en-US To: Vincent Guittot Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Morten Rasmussen , Vincent Donnefort , Quentin Perret , Patrick Bellasi , Abhijeet Dharmapurikar , Jian-Min , Qais Yousef , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20220829055450.1703092-1-dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> <20220829055450.1703092-2-dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> <12b3443a-6456-4a57-95b3-dd6be5b10873@arm.com> From: Dietmar Eggemann In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 06/09/2022 07:49, Vincent Guittot wrote: > On Fri, 2 Sept 2022 at 09:54, Dietmar Eggemann wrote: >> >> On 29/08/2022 12:13, Vincent Guittot wrote: >>> On Mon, 29 Aug 2022 at 12:03, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >>>> >>>> On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 10:08:13AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >>>>> On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 07:54:50AM +0200, Dietmar Eggemann wrote: >>>>>> From: Vincent Donnefort [...] >> We still need rq_clock_task_mult(rq), i.e. `rq->clock_task_mult` in >> _update_idle_rq_clock_pelt() though. > > Why ? If the mult is defined at boot we just have to use > "rq_clock_task(rq) << mult" instead of rq_clock_task(rq) when updating > clock_pelt Makes sense! Agreed.