Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/3] dt-bindings: sram: qcom,imem: Allow modem-tables subnode

[Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>]

On 2/17/26 9:25 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2026 at 02:30:31PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
>>
>> The IP Accelerator hardware/firmware owns a sizeable region within the
>> IMEM, named 'modem-tables', containing various packet processing
>> configuration data.
>>
>> It's not actually accessed by the OS, although we have to IOMMU-map it
>> with the IPA device, so that presumably the firmware can act upon it.
>>
>> Allow it as a subnode of IMEM.
> 
> You do not have compatible, so rely on the node name as ABI, which is
> fine in general but... I do not see usage of it in the driver. Why do
> you need to define modem-tables child then?

I don't really *need* the node name to be an ABI. However, the current
binding for IMEM only allows a named "pil-reloc@.." subnode (which is
consumed via of_find_compatible_node() in the remoteproc subsystem) so I
figured the intention was to keep the list of allowed subnodes strictly
moderated

If you'd prefer a blanket pattern declaration with say '^[a-z]@[0-9a-z]+$'
with just a reg requirement inside, I'm fine with that too

Konrad