mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Gaiser <simon@invisiblethingslab.com>
To: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>, xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	Piotr Luc <piotr.luc@intel.com>, Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
	Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	He Chen <he.chen@linux.intel.com>,
	Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com>,
	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [v6,3/3] x86/smpboot: Fix __max_logical_packages estimate
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2018 18:44:00 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <370a7ab2-8f57-b99b-428b-d0b1dfe401e7@invisiblethingslab.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171114124257.22013-4-prarit@redhat.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5203 bytes --]

Prarit Bhargava:
> A system booted with a small number of cores enabled per package
> panics because the estimate of __max_logical_packages is too low.
> This occurs when the total number of active cores across all packages
> is less than the maximum core count for a single package.
> 
> ie) On a 4 package system with 20 cores/package where only 4 cores
> are enabled on each package, the value of __max_logical_packages is
> calculated as DIV_ROUND_UP(16 / 20) = 1 and not 4.
> 
> Calculate __max_logical_packages after the cpu enumeration has completed.
> Use the boot cpu's data to extrapolate the number of packages.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
> Cc: x86@kernel.org
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
> Cc: Piotr Luc <piotr.luc@intel.com>
> Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
> Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
> Cc: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>
> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
> Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
> Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
> Cc: He Chen <he.chen@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com>
> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 55 +++++++++--------------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> index 838d36ff7ba6..2e3c5a394e79 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> @@ -308,12 +308,6 @@ int topology_update_package_map(unsigned int pkg, unsigned int cpu)
>  	if (new >= 0)
>  		goto found;
>  
> -	if (logical_packages >= __max_logical_packages) {
> -		pr_warn("Package %u of CPU %u exceeds BIOS package data %u.\n",
> -			logical_packages, cpu, __max_logical_packages);
> -		return -ENOSPC;
> -	}
> -
>  	new = logical_packages++;
>  	if (new != pkg)
>  		pr_info("CPU %u Converting physical %u to logical package %u\n",
> @@ -323,44 +317,6 @@ int topology_update_package_map(unsigned int pkg, unsigned int cpu)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static void __init smp_init_package_map(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, unsigned int cpu)
> -{
> -	unsigned int ncpus;
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * Today neither Intel nor AMD support heterogenous systems. That
> -	 * might change in the future....
> -	 *
> -	 * While ideally we'd want '* smp_num_siblings' in the below @ncpus
> -	 * computation, this won't actually work since some Intel BIOSes
> -	 * report inconsistent HT data when they disable HT.
> -	 *
> -	 * In particular, they reduce the APIC-IDs to only include the cores,
> -	 * but leave the CPUID topology to say there are (2) siblings.
> -	 * This means we don't know how many threads there will be until
> -	 * after the APIC enumeration.
> -	 *
> -	 * By not including this we'll sometimes over-estimate the number of
> -	 * logical packages by the amount of !present siblings, but this is
> -	 * still better than MAX_LOCAL_APIC.
> -	 *
> -	 * We use total_cpus not nr_cpu_ids because nr_cpu_ids can be limited
> -	 * on the command line leading to a similar issue as the HT disable
> -	 * problem because the hyperthreads are usually enumerated after the
> -	 * primary cores.
> -	 */
> -	ncpus = boot_cpu_data.x86_max_cores;
> -	if (!ncpus) {
> -		pr_warn("x86_max_cores == zero !?!?");
> -		ncpus = 1;
> -	}
> -
> -	__max_logical_packages = DIV_ROUND_UP(total_cpus, ncpus);
> -	pr_info("Max logical packages: %u\n", __max_logical_packages);
> -
> -	topology_update_package_map(c->phys_proc_id, cpu);
> -}
> -
>  void __init smp_store_boot_cpu_info(void)
>  {
>  	int id = 0; /* CPU 0 */
> @@ -368,7 +324,7 @@ void __init smp_store_boot_cpu_info(void)
>  
>  	*c = boot_cpu_data;
>  	c->cpu_index = id;
> -	smp_init_package_map(c, id);
> +	topology_update_package_map(c->phys_proc_id, id);
>  	cpu_data(id).set = 1;
>  }
>  
> @@ -1371,7 +1327,16 @@ void __init native_smp_prepare_boot_cpu(void)
>  
>  void __init native_smp_cpus_done(unsigned int max_cpus)
>  {
> +	int ncpus;
> +
>  	pr_debug("Boot done\n");
> +	/*
> +	 * Today neither Intel nor AMD support heterogenous systems so
> +	 * extrapolate the boot cpu's data to all packages.
> +	 */
> +	ncpus = cpu_data(0).booted_cores * smp_num_siblings;
> +	__max_logical_packages = DIV_ROUND_UP(nr_cpu_ids, ncpus);
> +	pr_info("Max logical packages: %u\n", __max_logical_packages);
>  
>  	if (x86_has_numa_in_package)
>  		set_sched_topology(x86_numa_in_package_topology);

This breaks booting as Xen PV domain for me. The problem seems to be
that native_smp_cpus_done() is never called on a PV domain. So
__max_logical_packages is uninitialized and this leads to a NULL
pointer dereference in coretemp.


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-02-07 18:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-14 12:42 [PATCH v6 0/3] Fix panic in logical packages calculation Prarit Bhargava
2017-11-14 12:42 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Cache logical pkg id in uncore driver Prarit Bhargava
2017-11-17 15:27   ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Andi Kleen
2017-11-14 12:42 ` [PATCH v6 2/3] x86/topology: Avoid wasting 128k for package id array Prarit Bhargava
2017-11-17 14:59   ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-11-17 15:27   ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Andi Kleen
2017-11-14 12:42 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] x86/smpboot: Fix __max_logical_packages estimate Prarit Bhargava
2017-11-17 15:27   ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Prarit Bhargava
2018-02-07 18:44   ` Simon Gaiser [this message]
2018-02-07 19:04     ` [v6,3/3] " Prarit Bhargava
2018-02-07 19:26       ` Simon Gaiser
2018-02-07 19:31         ` Prarit Bhargava

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=370a7ab2-8f57-b99b-428b-d0b1dfe401e7@invisiblethingslab.com \
    --to=simon@invisiblethingslab.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=he.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=minipli@googlemail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=piotr.luc@intel.com \
    --cc=prarit@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®