From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>
Cc: heiko@sntech.de, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
Finley Xiao <finley.xiao@rock-chips.com>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
Detlev Casanova <detlev.casanova@collabora.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] soc: rockchip: power-domain: add power domain support for rk3562
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 08:32:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3712d97e-8a2d-47fb-8f95-a9153c71dab3@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPDyKFqYjTsWsqf-C+iHJz3x-RKdsm2-2cPm-HMeH=WBNzcSLw@mail.gmail.com>
On 16/01/2025 15:46, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> static const struct rockchip_pmu_info rk3568_pmu = {
>> .pwr_offset = 0xa0,
>> .status_offset = 0x98,
>> @@ -1429,6 +1471,10 @@ static const struct of_device_id rockchip_pm_domain_dt_match[] = {
>> .compatible = "rockchip,rk3399-power-controller",
>> .data = (void *)&rk3399_pmu,
>> },
>> + {
>> + .compatible = "rockchip,rk3562-power-controller",
>
> I couldn't find the corresponding DT patch where this compatible is
> being documented. Can you please re-send and keep me posted for both
> the DT and pmdomain patch?
I already commented on this on 1st patch - the split of original
patchset is entirely broken and actual binding is missing. Or not
missing but sent to entirely different folks in different thread...
Best regards,
Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-17 7:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-24 9:39 [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: power: add power binding header for RK3562 SoC Kever Yang
2024-12-24 9:39 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] soc: rockchip: power-domain: add power domain support for rk3562 Kever Yang
2025-01-16 14:46 ` Ulf Hansson
2025-01-17 7:32 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2024-12-27 8:31 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: power: add power binding header for RK3562 SoC Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3712d97e-8a2d-47fb-8f95-a9153c71dab3@linaro.org \
--to=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=detlev.casanova@collabora.com \
--cc=finley.xiao@rock-chips.com \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=kever.yang@rock-chips.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®