From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754080AbdEQJV0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 May 2017 05:21:26 -0400 Received: from smtp.eu.citrix.com ([185.25.65.24]:5603 "EHLO SMTP.EU.CITRIX.COM" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753709AbdEQJVX (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 May 2017 05:21:23 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.38,353,1491264000"; d="scan'208";a="46203888" Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4-only] openvswitch: clear sender cpu before forwarding packets To: Greg KH References: <1494944710-7901-1-git-send-email-anoob.soman@citrix.com> <20170517081933.GA25610@kroah.com> CC: , , , , , , Eric Dumazet From: Anoob Soman Message-ID: <371bcd34-10fa-867f-8bfb-7f61caf11cbe@citrix.com> Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 10:21:09 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170517081933.GA25610@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ClientProxiedBy: FTLPEX02CAS02.citrite.net (10.13.99.123) To AMSPEX02CL02.citrite.net (10.69.22.126) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 17/05/17 09:19, Greg KH wrote: > Why is this a non-upstream patch? What commit in Linus's tree fixed > this? Why not just backport that? > > thanks, > > greg k-h Agreed, I think it is sensible to backport 52bd2d62ce67 "net: better skb->sender_cpu and skb->napi_id cohabitation" to 4.4, rather than having a different patch. I think backport might be required for 4.1 as well, but I haven't checked. -Anoob.