From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
x86@kernel.org, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>,
Youquan Song <youquan.song@intel.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/24] x86/entry: Introduce struct ist_regs
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 15:13:05 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3729bc02-1e4b-d2db-aabb-cb3610d8fd7d@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9fe0e26b-5fb7-4521-a01e-8edd8d5cb74c@zytor.com>
On 2021/9/10 12:31, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Note: the examples in this email all compiled with:
>
> gcc -O2 -mpreferred-stack-boundary=3 -mcmodel=kernel
>
> The disassembly has been slightly simplified.
Saving results in registers is non-flexible no matter in ASM or hack in C like this.
Saving CR3 in ist_regs is not different than saving rax in pt_regs, and both of
ist_regs and embedded pt_regs can be moved when stack is required to switch.
I prefer to my original design.
>
>
> On 9/9/21 5:18 PM, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>>
>> This patch was over designed.
>>
>> In ASM code, we can easily save results in the callee-saved registers.
>> For example, rc3 is saved in %r14, gsbase info is saved in %rbx.
>>
>> And in C code, we can't save results in registers. And I thought there was
>> no place to save the results because the CR3 and gsbase are not kernel's.
>> So I extended the pt_regs to ist_regs to save the results.
>>
>> But it was incorrect. The results can be saved in percpu data at the end of
>> paranoid_entry() after the CR3/gsbase are settled down. And the results
>> can be read at the beginning of paranoid_exit() before the CR3/gsbase are
>> switched to the interrupted context's.
>>
>
> OK, count me confused. Of course you can save results in caller-saved registers in C; it is kind of what they do:
>
>
> extern void bar(void);
>
> unsigned long foo(unsigned long v)
> {
> bar();
> return v;
> }
>
> 0000000000000000 <foo>:
> 0: 41 54 push %r12
> 2: 49 89 fc mov %rdi,%r12
> 5: e8 00 00 00 00 callq bar
> a: 4c 89 e0 mov %r12,%rax
> d: 41 5c pop %r12
> f: c3 retq
>
> Now, if you need to specify *which* registers, you have to declare them as global register variables - NOT local (which
> have completely different semantics). This also means that you (probably) want to isolate this code into its own
> compilation unit, because it will prevent any other code in the same .c file from using that register as well.
>
> For example:
>
> register unsigned long r14 asm("%r14");
> unsigned long foo(unsigned long v)
> {
> r14 = v;
> bar();
> v = r14;
> return v;
> }
>
> 0000000000000000 <foo>:
> 0: 49 89 fe mov %rdi,%r14
> 3: e8 00 00 00 00 callq bar
> 8: 4c 89 f0 mov %r14,%rax
> b: c3 retq
>
> WARNING: This also means that gcc will happily discard the old value in %r14, so if you need it preserved you have to do
> so explicitly; if you are called direct from assembly and are happy to lose the value then the above code is fine -- and
> it is even slightly more efficient!
>
> For preserving the old r14, in this case:
>
> register unsigned long r14 asm("%r14");
> unsigned long foo(unsigned long v)
> {
> unsigned long saved_r14 = r14;
> r14 = v;
> bar();
> v = r14;
> r14 = saved_r14;
> return v;
> }
>
> 0000000000000000 <foo>:
> 0: 53 push %rbx
> 1: 4c 89 f3 mov %r14,%rbx
> 4: 49 89 fe mov %rdi,%r14
> 7: e8 00 00 00 00 callq bar
> c: 4c 89 f0 mov %r14,%rax
> f: 49 89 de mov %rbx,%r14
> 12: 5b pop %rbx
> 13: c3 retq
>
>
> HOWEVER, if you are relying on not using the stack, then using C code is probably very much not a good idea. It is very
> hard to guarantee that just because the C compiler is *currently* not using a stack, that it won't do so *in the future*.
>
> Again, finally, local register variables DO NOT WORK, this does NOT do what you expect:
>
> unsigned long foo(unsigned long v)
> {
> register unsigned long r14 asm("%r14") = v;
> bar();
> return r14;
> }
>
> 0000000000000000 <foo>:
> 0: 41 54 push %r12
> 2: 49 89 fc mov %rdi,%r12
> 5: e8 00 00 00 00 callq bar
> a: 4c 89 e0 mov %r12,%rax
> d: 41 5c pop %r12
> f: c3 retq
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-10 7:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-31 17:50 [PATCH 00/24] x86/entry/64: Convert a bunch of ASM entry code into C code Lai Jiangshan
2021-08-31 17:50 ` [PATCH 01/24] x86/traps: Remove stack-protector from traps.c Lai Jiangshan
2021-08-31 17:50 ` [PATCH 02/24] x86/traps: Move arch/x86/kernel/traps.c to arch/x86/entry/ Lai Jiangshan
2021-09-02 8:09 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-09-02 9:21 ` Lai Jiangshan
2021-09-02 10:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-02 11:54 ` Lai Jiangshan
2021-09-02 12:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-02 13:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-02 17:05 ` Nick Desaulniers
2021-09-02 17:19 ` Miguel Ojeda
2021-09-02 17:23 ` Nick Desaulniers
2021-09-03 7:36 ` Martin Liška
2021-09-07 21:12 ` Nick Desaulniers
2021-09-08 7:33 ` Martin Liška
2021-08-31 17:50 ` [PATCH 03/24] x86/traps: Move declaration of native_irq_return_iret up Lai Jiangshan
2021-08-31 17:50 ` [PATCH 04/24] x86/entry: Expose the address of .Lgs_change to traps.c Lai Jiangshan
2021-09-02 9:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-02 9:20 ` Lai Jiangshan
2021-08-31 17:50 ` [PATCH 05/24] x86/entry: Introduce __entry_text for entry code written in C Lai Jiangshan
2021-08-31 19:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-01 0:23 ` Lai Jiangshan
2021-08-31 17:50 ` [PATCH 06/24] x86/entry: Move PTI_USER_* to arch/x86/include/asm/processor-flags.h Lai Jiangshan
2021-08-31 17:50 ` [PATCH 07/24] x86: Mark __native_read_cr3() & native_write_cr3() as __always_inline Lai Jiangshan
2021-08-31 17:50 ` [PATCH 08/24] x86/traps: Add C verion of SWITCH_TO_KERNEL_CR3 as switch_to_kernel_cr3() Lai Jiangshan
2021-08-31 17:50 ` [PATCH 09/24] x86/traps: Add fence_swapgs_{user,kernel}_entry() Lai Jiangshan
2021-09-02 9:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-08-31 17:50 ` [PATCH 10/24] x86/traps: Move pt_regs only in fixup_bad_iret() Lai Jiangshan
2021-08-31 17:50 ` [PATCH 11/24] x86/entry: Replace the most of asm code of error_entry to C code Lai Jiangshan
2021-09-02 10:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-02 12:08 ` Lai Jiangshan
2021-08-31 17:50 ` [PATCH 12/24] x86/traps: Reconstruct pt_regs on task stack directly in fixup_bad_iret() Lai Jiangshan
2021-08-31 17:50 ` [PATCH 13/24] x86/traps: Mark sync_regs() and fixup_bad_iret() as static __always_inline Lai Jiangshan
2021-08-31 17:50 ` [PATCH 14/24] x86/entry: Make paranoid_exit() callable Lai Jiangshan
2021-08-31 17:50 ` [PATCH 15/24] x86/entry: Call paranoid_exit() in asm_exc_nmi() Lai Jiangshan
2021-08-31 17:50 ` [PATCH 16/24] x86/entry: Use skip_rdi instead of save_ret for PUSH_AND_CLEAR_REGS Lai Jiangshan
2021-08-31 17:50 ` [PATCH 17/24] x86/entry: Introduce struct ist_regs Lai Jiangshan
2021-09-10 0:18 ` Lai Jiangshan
2021-09-10 0:36 ` Lai Jiangshan
2021-09-10 4:31 ` H. Peter Anvin
2021-09-10 7:13 ` Lai Jiangshan [this message]
2021-09-10 7:14 ` H. Peter Anvin
2021-09-10 4:50 ` H. Peter Anvin
2021-09-10 4:51 ` H. Peter Anvin
2021-08-31 17:50 ` [PATCH 18/24] x86/entry: Add the C version ist_switch_to_kernel_cr3() Lai Jiangshan
2021-08-31 17:50 ` [PATCH 19/24] x86/entry: Add the C version ist_restore_cr3() Lai Jiangshan
2021-08-31 17:50 ` [PATCH 20/24] x86/entry: Add the C version get_percpu_base() Lai Jiangshan
2021-08-31 17:50 ` [PATCH 21/24] x86/entry: Add the C version ist_switch_to_kernel_gsbase() Lai Jiangshan
2021-08-31 17:50 ` [PATCH 22/24] x86/entry: Implement and use do_paranoid_entry() and paranoid_exit() Lai Jiangshan
2021-09-02 10:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-02 10:42 ` Lai Jiangshan
2021-09-02 12:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-02 11:58 ` Lai Jiangshan
2021-09-02 12:29 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-08-31 17:50 ` [PATCH 23/24] x86/entry: Remove the unused ASM macros Lai Jiangshan
2021-08-31 17:50 ` [PATCH 24/24] x86/syscall/64: Move the checking for sysret to C code Lai Jiangshan
2021-09-10 7:20 ` Nikolay Borisov
2021-09-10 7:30 ` Lai Jiangshan
2021-08-31 20:44 ` [PATCH 00/24] x86/entry/64: Convert a bunch of ASM entry code into " Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-02 6:28 ` Lai Jiangshan
2021-09-02 7:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-02 10:50 ` [PATCH 25/24] x86/traps: Rewrite native_load_gs_index in " Lai Jiangshan
2021-09-08 1:38 ` H. Peter Anvin
2021-09-08 4:42 ` H. Peter Anvin
2021-09-08 5:00 ` H. Peter Anvin
2021-09-08 7:12 ` Lai Jiangshan
2021-09-09 23:16 ` H. Peter Anvin
2021-09-13 20:01 ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-09-14 2:04 ` Lai Jiangshan
2021-09-14 8:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-14 8:17 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-09-14 8:40 ` Lai Jiangshan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3729bc02-1e4b-d2db-aabb-cb3610d8fd7d@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=laijs@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=jroedel@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=youquan.song@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome