From: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
To: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org>,
<mugunthanvnm@ti.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: ethernet: ti: davinci_cpdma: fix fixed prio cpdma ctlr configuration
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 10:37:29 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <37548a54-c54b-3194-691a-22fa8118ed3d@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <592966c0-ae4c-ba6b-43ba-8ca837e9a700@linaro.org>
On 11/09/2016 05:56 PM, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote:
>
>
> On 09.11.16 23:09, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 11/08/2016 07:10 AM, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote:
>>> The dma ctlr is reseted to 0 while cpdma start, thus cpdma ctlr
>>
>> I assume this is because cpdma_ctlr_start() does soft reset. Is it
>> correct?
> Probably not. I've seen this register doesn't hold any previous settings
> (just trash)
What register CPDMA_DMACONTROL or CPSW_DMACTRL?
> after cpdma_ctlr_stop(), actually after last channel is stopped (inside
> of cpdma_ctlr_stop()).
So, You are stating that Registers context is changed after stop?
> Then cpdma_ctlr_start() just reset it to 0.
"just trash" or "0".
Sry, I do not see how cpdma_ctlr_stop() can affect on registers state :(
and I'd very appreciated if can provide more detailed information.
>
>>
>>> cannot be configured after cpdma is stopped. So, restore content
>>> of cpdma ctlr while off/on procedure.
>>>
>>> Based on net-next/master
>>
>> ^ remove it
> sure
>
>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c | 6 +-
>>> drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_cpdma.c | 103
>>> +++++++++++++++++---------------
>>> drivers/net/ethernet/ti/davinci_cpdma.h | 2 +
>>> 3 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
>>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
>>> index b1ddf89..4d04b8e 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
>>> @@ -1376,10 +1376,6 @@ static int cpsw_ndo_open(struct net_device *ndev)
>>> ALE_ALL_PORTS, ALE_ALL_PORTS, 0, 0);
>>>
>>> if (!cpsw_common_res_usage_state(cpsw)) {
>>> - /* setup tx dma to fixed prio and zero offset */
>>> - cpdma_control_set(cpsw->dma, CPDMA_TX_PRIO_FIXED, 1);
>>> - cpdma_control_set(cpsw->dma, CPDMA_RX_BUFFER_OFFSET, 0);
>>> -
>>> /* disable priority elevation */
>>> __raw_writel(0, &cpsw->regs->ptype);
>>>
>>> @@ -2710,6 +2706,8 @@ static int cpsw_probe(struct platform_device
>>> *pdev)
>>> dma_params.desc_align = 16;
>>> dma_params.has_ext_regs = true;
>>> dma_params.desc_hw_addr = dma_params.desc_mem_phys;
>>> + dma_params.rxbuf_offset = 0;
>>> + dma_params.fixed_prio = 1;
>>
>> Do we really need this new parameters? Do you have plans to use other
>> values?
> I'm ok if this is static (equally as a bunch of rest in dma_params), no
> see reason to use other values,
That's what i wanted to know :) - go static, pls.
> it at least now. But the issue is not only in these two parameters and
> not only in cpsw_ndo_open().
> It touches cpsw_set_channels() also, where ctlr stop/start is present.
> In order to not copy cpdma_control_set(cpsw->dma, CPDMA_TX_PRIO_FIXED,
> 1)...
> in all such kind places in eth drivers, better to allow the cpdma to
> control it's parameters...
>
> The cpdma ctlr register holds a little more parameters (but only two of
> them are set in cpsw)
> Maybe there is reason to save them also. Actually I'd seen this problem
> when playing with
> on/off channel shapers, unfortunately the cpdma ctlr holds this info
> also, and it was lost
> while on/off (but I'm going to restore it in chan_start()).
>
I understand you change, but I'm note sure about real root cause :(
--
regards,
-grygorii
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-10 16:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-08 13:10 Ivan Khoronzhuk
2016-11-09 21:09 ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-11-09 23:56 ` Ivan Khoronzhuk
2016-11-10 16:37 ` Grygorii Strashko [this message]
2016-11-10 19:52 ` ivan.khoronzhuk
2016-11-10 22:58 ` Grygorii Strashko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=37548a54-c54b-3194-691a-22fa8118ed3d@ti.com \
--to=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
--cc=ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mugunthanvnm@ti.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®