mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Ben Guthro <benjamin.guthro@citrix.com>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	xen-devel@lists.xen.org,
	Richard L Maliszewski <richard.l.maliszewski@intel.com>,
	Gang Wei <gang.wei@intel.com>, Shane Wang <shane.wang@intel.com>,
	Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>,
	tboot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] Xen/ACPI: support sleep state entering on hardware reduced systems
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 16:05:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3763656.ERXJ8VWMlL@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1372427184-6197-1-git-send-email-benjamin.guthro@citrix.com>

On Friday, June 28, 2013 09:46:19 AM Ben Guthro wrote:
> In version 3.4 acpi_os_prepare_sleep() got introduced in parallel with
> reduced hardware sleep support, and the two changes didn't get
> synchronized: The new code doesn't call the hook function (if so
> requested). Fix this, requiring a boolean parameter to be added to the
> hook function to distinguish "extended" from "legacy" sleep.
> 
> This requires adjusting TXT, but the adjustments only go as far as
> failing the extended mode call (since, looking at the TXT interface,
> there doesn't even appear to be precautions to deal with that
> alternative interface).
> 
> The hypervisor change underlying this is commit 62d1a69 ("ACPI: support
> v5 (reduced HW) sleep interface") on the master branch of
> git://xenbits.xen.org/xen.git.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Guthro <benjamin.guthro@citrix.com>
> Cc: Richard L Maliszewski <richard.l.maliszewski@intel.com>
> Cc: Gang Wei <gang.wei@intel.com>
> Cc: Shane Wang <shane.wang@intel.com>
> Cc: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: tboot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net 
> 
> v2: Extend description to include reference to hypervisor side change
> v3: Split into multiple patches, separating subsystems
>     Remove bool parameters, in favor of u8
> v4: Remove linux/acpi.h dependencies
>     Further patch split to break out acpica from OSL
>     More bool vs u8 fixes
> v5: Fix build of consumers of acpi_os_prepare_sleep() interface change,
>     so intermediate builds of partial patch series will not fail.
> 
> Ben Guthro (5):
>   acpi: Remove need to include linux/acpi.h in common acpica code
>   acpi: Call acpi_os_prepare_sleep hook in reduced hardware sleep path
>   acpi: Adjust linux acpi OS functions to new extended parameter
>   x86/tboot: Fail extended mode reduced hardware sleep
>   xen/acpi: notify xen when reduced hardware sleep is available

I've just replied to [0/5] from the previous series, here:

http://marc.info/?l=linux-acpi&m=137493312722239&w=2

Thanks,
Rafael


      parent reply	other threads:[~2013-07-27 13:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-28 13:46 Ben Guthro
2013-06-28 13:46 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] acpi: Remove need to include linux/acpi.h in common acpica code Ben Guthro
2013-06-28 16:07   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-06-28 13:46 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] acpi: Call acpi_os_prepare_sleep hook in reduced hardware sleep path Ben Guthro
2013-06-28 16:06   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-06-28 13:46 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] acpi: Adjust linux acpi OS functions to new extended parameter Ben Guthro
2013-06-28 16:03   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-06-28 16:15     ` Ben Guthro
2013-06-28 13:46 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] x86/tboot: Fail extended mode reduced hardware sleep Ben Guthro
2013-06-28 16:05   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-06-28 13:46 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] xen/acpi: notify xen when reduced hardware sleep is available Ben Guthro
2013-06-28 16:05   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-07-27 14:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3763656.ERXJ8VWMlL@vostro.rjw.lan \
    --to=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=benjamin.guthro@citrix.com \
    --cc=gang.wei@intel.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=richard.l.maliszewski@intel.com \
    --cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
    --cc=shane.wang@intel.com \
    --cc=tboot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®