From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ewsoutbound.kpnmail.nl (ewsoutbound.kpnmail.nl [195.121.94.185]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED0B918626 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2025 23:16:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=195.121.94.185 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761866215; cv=none; b=fCIkzHcqmzeGEsMVh+CrIjrwA/16y0vALauCVFy86h14V/PGTD8VeotdtksLzVE84vtWwbN9Xuz3lMMGVhJblONixV79ssH+OGVCc3FV0zdlLh2oSasQXpqc4pvqI0MAOMwOHdwEbx5EVPPCmg2/klMmWAcNRPSk6t9kJTI+ClY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761866215; c=relaxed/simple; bh=y/pMhtAY6aDI+qio1HW/3c1HsYOCGlxTJmkqJ+SXXJg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:Subject: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Tlse0SkTYJBYgJ7ANgvtRFfrrwxYDMMOvzFip4P7NzWL0VeQG09TkqculL7D3+ZMNaZtrvxSZmq2N8AO6iL6rn4XpaFB7/JTvx/+NcrUg6w//o/imPAAJbzCzPNbBjk2XBAUJq9wSKi7vnlI/PzqGN/q3ExOHrOfHYP3jgsxG5E= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=xs4all.nl; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xs4all.nl; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=xs4all.nl header.i=@xs4all.nl header.b=IAaauqAS; arc=none smtp.client-ip=195.121.94.185 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=xs4all.nl Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xs4all.nl Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=xs4all.nl header.i=@xs4all.nl header.b="IAaauqAS" X-KPN-MessageId: 85701c09-b5e6-11f0-ad1a-005056999439 Received: from mta.kpnmail.nl (unknown [10.31.161.188]) by ewsoutbound.so.kpn.org (Halon) with ESMTPS id 85701c09-b5e6-11f0-ad1a-005056999439; Fri, 31 Oct 2025 00:16:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from mtaoutbound.kpnmail.nl (unknown [10.128.135.190]) by mta.kpnmail.nl (Halon) with ESMTP id 82d3e8f0-b5e6-11f0-80d9-00505699693e; Fri, 31 Oct 2025 00:16:49 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=xs4all.nl; s=xs4all01; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:message-id:to:from:date; bh=Gy4xuVB7w4pGiyyG/lYc5237rSMjBJld3aDWEdwUJQY=; b=IAaauqASu0lHCi94kRX492ATERYPMYcjbnaWg0aeTVZapm9gupXO1ohzfiUPSaAa4NOChenZ95ylu +9OLZaBsMoGAl3kalYX+JOyZqy+BFpp865tpQjmJTO13kS/slYu/uila6H70wN3n4mNtPZVRRWxErl +V7dr3iK8+1qc6aTkGBqDCZVLbyMqdX2XxAJ+cz+Vrq8WiACt4FvtR9PZKIMtIQBBy2F+clsqH/XP6 esxul9KuOUPZVRj4JYME2CTUsVo7dv4DERRZEdzq+zX3qrRbV0CXfs2lodCutGB5L/CMJ0K2DJznGr LQ1YH9NWtXNDA37VuHBDIsUJe8kH5Jg== X-KPN-MID: 33|r74kNLLGbwWQ1nJhuSb0Zll1AsjR7RPiUa3q+IklmQ4HLbfB7X9FOZdQuFIqLbn WniAch+RFgG/ReZyINkWzsw== X-CMASSUN: 33|+2p858qcRq6PC3aNuxP7FW9krUcvDJ8/QakZzivxnbPMyH8hDVmDGUxSIOGjsiB h0BieK78A3/RczEQk7SQoug== X-KPN-VerifiedSender: Yes Received: from cpxoxapps-mh08 (cpxoxapps-mh08.personalcloud.so.kpn.org [10.128.135.214]) by mtaoutbound.kpnmail.nl (Halon) with ESMTPSA id 82cc2ca6-b5e6-11f0-b8d7-005056995d6c; Fri, 31 Oct 2025 00:16:49 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2025 00:16:48 +0100 (CET) From: Jori Koolstra To: Jan Kara Cc: Christian Brauner , "skhan@linuxfoundation.org" , Khalid Aziz , Tetsuo Handa , Taotao Chen , Jeff Layton , NeilBrown , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, syzbot+4e49728ec1cbaf3b91d2@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Message-ID: <37767163.3215767.1761866208997@kpc.webmail.kpnmail.nl> In-Reply-To: References: <20251028205857.386719-1-jkoolstra@xs4all.nl> <792975039.3142581.1761826973320@kpc.webmail.kpnmail.nl> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add error handling to minix filesystem similar to ext4 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal > > Hi Jori! > Hi Jan, thank you for your encouraging reply, I appreciate it. > > Well, one thing is handling corruption well - that part of your patch was > fine and I think it is still useful - another thing are the mount options > that allow to configure what happens when we find a corruption - and that > is the part I don't think really makes a lot of sense for minix. > I already had a patch for this specific syzbot bug, and tested with the reproducer, but without the new mount options. What I could do is submit this and see if the community will accept it. Is that reasonable?