From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
To: righiandr@users.sourceforge.net
Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] per-task I/O throttling
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 23:57:41 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3777.1200113861@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:32:49 +0100." <47879A32.8060508@users.sourceforge.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 691 bytes --]
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:32:49 +0100, Andrea Righi said:
> The interesting feature is that it allows to set a priority for each
> process container, but AFAIK it doesn't allow to "partition" the
> bandwidth between different containers (that would be a nice feature
> IMHO). For example it would be great to be able to define per-container
> limits, like assign 10MB/s for processes in container A, 30MB/s to
> container B, 20MB/s to container C, etc.
Has anybody considered allocating based on *seeks* rather than bytes moved,
or counting seeks as "virtual bytes" for the purposes of accounting (if the
disk can do 50mbytes/sec, and a seek takes 5millisecs, then count it as 100K
of data)?
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 226 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-12 4:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-10 22:45 Andrea Righi
2008-01-11 1:50 ` Bill Davidsen
2008-01-11 10:28 ` Andrea Righi
2008-01-11 14:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-01-11 15:29 ` Andrea Righi
2008-01-11 14:05 ` David Newall
2008-01-11 15:44 ` Andrea Righi
2008-01-16 19:21 ` David Newall
2008-01-11 15:59 ` Balbir Singh
2008-01-11 16:32 ` Andrea Righi
2008-01-12 4:57 ` Valdis.Kletnieks [this message]
2008-01-12 9:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-01-12 10:57 ` Balbir Singh
2008-01-12 11:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-01-12 18:01 ` Andrea Righi
2008-01-13 4:46 ` Balbir Singh
2008-01-15 16:49 ` [RFC][PATCH] per-uid/gid I/O throttling (was Re: [RFC][PATCH] per-task I/O throttling) Andrea Righi
2008-01-11 17:58 ` Pavel Machek
2008-01-23 15:41 ` Andrea Righi
2008-01-16 10:45 ` Balbir Singh
2008-01-16 11:30 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-01-16 12:05 ` Balbir Singh
2008-01-16 12:24 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-01-16 12:58 ` Andrea Righi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3777.1200113861@turing-police.cc.vt.edu \
--to=valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=righiandr@users.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®