From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Stanley Jhu <stanleyjhu@google.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <mkp@kernel.org>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>,
Peter Wang <peter.wang@mediatek.com>,
Can Guo <can.guo@oss.qualcomm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: core: Fix double completion in ufshcd_clear_lu_cmds()
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2026 09:55:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3779e125-9acc-42c8-9489-51b9e3c6716d@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261016085403.1711740-1-stanleyjhu@google.com>
On 10/16/26 1:54 AM, Stanley Jhu wrote:
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&hba->outstanding_lock, flags);
> + outstanding = __test_and_clear_bit(tag, &hba->outstanding_reqs);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hba->outstanding_lock, flags);
> +
> + if (outstanding)
> + ufshcd_compl_one_cqe(hba, tag, NULL);
The above code is identical to a code block in ufshcd_abort().
Additionally, a more generic version of this code is present in
ufshcd_poll(). Maybe this is a good time to move the code below into
a new helper function such that code duplication is avoided?
spin_lock_irqsave(&hba->outstanding_lock, flags);
tr_doorbell = ufshcd_readl(hba, REG_UTP_TRANSFER_REQ_DOOR_BELL);
completed_reqs = ~tr_doorbell & hba->outstanding_reqs;
WARN_ONCE(completed_reqs & ~hba->outstanding_reqs,
"completed: %#lx; outstanding: %#lx\n", completed_reqs,
hba->outstanding_reqs);
if (queue_num == UFSHCD_POLL_FROM_INTERRUPT_CONTEXT) {
/* Do not complete polled requests from interrupt context. */
ufshcd_clear_polled(hba, &completed_reqs);
}
hba->outstanding_reqs &= ~completed_reqs;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hba->outstanding_lock, flags);
Thanks,
Bart.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-16 16:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-16 8:54 Stanley Jhu
2026-10-16 16:55 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3779e125-9acc-42c8-9489-51b9e3c6716d@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
--cc=can.guo@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkp@kernel.org \
--cc=peter.wang@mediatek.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stanleyjhu@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®