Re: [GIT PULL] phy: for 4.15 -rc

[Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>]

Hi,

On Friday 08 December 2017 09:51 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 06:27:09PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>> Hi Greg,
>>
>> Please find the pull request for 4.15 -rc cycle below.
>>
>> It fixes a compilation error, fix in handling error case and
>> there is a fix in exynos5-usbdrd to enumerate superspeed devices
>> on Odroid XU3 (This includes a fix in usb/dwc3/core and I've got
>> Acked-by from Felipe Balbi for this).
>>
>> Consider merging it for this -rc cycle and let me know if I have to
>> make any changes.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Kishon
>>
>> The following changes since commit 4fbd8d194f06c8a3fd2af1ce560ddb31f7ec8323:
>>
>>   Linux 4.15-rc1 (2017-11-26 16:01:47 -0800)
>>
>> are available in the git repository at:
>>
>>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kishon/linux-phy.git tags/phy-for-4.15-rc
>>
>> for you to fetch changes up to 521e84ab2507008fd9f823147ce19318f64bd9ab:
>>
>>   phy: rcar-gen3-usb2: select USB_COMMON (2017-12-08 18:02:01 +0530)
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> phy: for 4.15 -rc
>>
>>  *) Fix in exynos5-usbdrd to enumerate SuperSpeed devices on Odroid XU3
>>  *) Fix device-tree node lookups in tegra xusb
>>  *) Fix platform_get_irq_byname's error checking in cpcap-usb phy driver
>>  *) Fix in rockchip-typec phy driver to balance pm_runtime_enable/disable
>>  *) Fix compiler error in rcar-gen3-usb2 phy when USB is disabled
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> Arnd Bergmann (1):
>>       phy: rcar-gen3-usb2: select USB_COMMON
>>
>> Arvind Yadav (1):
>>       phy: cpcap-usb: Fix platform_get_irq_byname's error checking.
>>
>> Chris Zhong (1):
>>       phy: rockchip-typec: add pm_runtime_disable in err case
>>
>> Johan Hovold (1):
>>       phy: tegra: fix device-tree node lookups
>>
>> Vivek Gautam (1):
>>       phy: exynos5-usbdrd: Calibrate LOS levels for exynos5420/5800
> 
> This patch really doesn't feel like a "bugfix" but rather a "add a new
> feature", and the size of the patch itself kind of agrees with that.
> 
> It looks like adding a new feature of "calibrate" might make the
> hardware work now, but it didn't work before, so this isn't a
> regression, right?

right, it's not a regression. Will include the patch while sending pull request
for the next merge cycle.
> 
> Care to redo this pull request without that patch?

sure. Sent a v2 pull request.

Thanks
Kishon