From: <Parthiban.Veerasooran@microchip.com>
To: <ramon.nordin.rodriguez@ferroamp.se>
Cc: <andrew@lunn.ch>, <hkallweit1@gmail.com>, <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
<davem@davemloft.net>, <edumazet@google.com>, <kuba@kernel.org>,
<pabeni@redhat.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <Horatiu.Vultur@microchip.com>,
<Woojung.Huh@microchip.com>, <Nicolas.Ferre@microchip.com>,
<Thorsten.Kummermehr@microchip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 4/6] net: phy: microchip_t1s: fix reset complete status handling
Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 13:16:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <37890657-bb37-0327-56d2-6193ac275a0c@microchip.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZHBcUvSbX0taOED3@debian>
Hi Ramon,
On 26/05/23 12:44 pm, Ramón Nordin Rodriguez wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>
> On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 06:00:08AM +0000, Parthiban.Veerasooran@microchip.com wrote:
>> Hi Ramon,
>>>> + /* Read STS2 register and check for the Reset Complete status to do the
>>>> + * init configuration. If the Reset Complete is not set, wait for 5us
>>>> + * and then read STS2 register again and check for Reset Complete status.
>>>> + * Still if it is failed then declare PHY reset error or else proceed
>>>> + * for the PHY initial register configuration.
>>>> + */
>>>
>>> This comment explains exactly what the code does, which is also obvious
>>> from reading the code. A meaningful comment would be explaining why the
>>> state can change 5us later.
>>>
>> As per design, LAN867x reset to be completed by 3us. Just for a safer
>> side it is recommended to use 5us. With the assumption of more than 3us
>> completion, the first read checks for the Reset Complete. If the
>> config_init is more faster, then once again checks for it after 5us.
>>
>> As you mentioned, can we remove the existing block comment as it
>> explains the code and add the above comment to explain 5us delay.
>> What is your opinion on this proposal?
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Parthiban V
>>
>
> I'd suggest the following
> /*The chip completes a reset in 3us, we might get here earlier than that,
> as an added margin we'll conditionally sleep 5us*/
Ok I will use this proposal in the next version.
Best Regards,
Parthiban V
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-26 13:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-24 14:45 [PATCH net-next v3 0/6] microchip_t1s: Update on Microchip 10BASE-T1S PHY driver Parthiban Veerasooran
2023-05-24 14:45 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/6] net: phy: microchip_t1s: modify driver description to be more generic Parthiban Veerasooran
2023-05-25 18:15 ` Ramón Nordin Rodriguez
2023-05-24 14:45 ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/6] net: phy: microchip_t1s: replace read-modify-write code with phy_modify_mmd Parthiban Veerasooran
2023-05-25 1:04 ` Andrew Lunn
2023-05-25 15:08 ` Ramón Nordin Rodriguez
2023-05-26 5:48 ` Parthiban.Veerasooran
2023-05-26 7:10 ` Ramón Nordin Rodriguez
2023-05-26 13:22 ` Parthiban.Veerasooran
2023-05-26 14:02 ` Ramón Nordin Rodriguez
2023-05-26 14:15 ` Parthiban.Veerasooran
2023-05-25 15:30 ` Ramón Nordin Rodriguez
2023-05-25 15:50 ` Andrew Lunn
2023-05-24 14:45 ` [PATCH net-next v3 3/6] net: phy: microchip_t1s: update LAN867x PHY supported revision number Parthiban Veerasooran
2023-05-25 1:08 ` Andrew Lunn
2023-05-25 18:19 ` Ramón Nordin Rodriguez
2023-05-24 14:45 ` [PATCH net-next v3 4/6] net: phy: microchip_t1s: fix reset complete status handling Parthiban Veerasooran
2023-05-25 1:09 ` Andrew Lunn
2023-05-25 18:26 ` Ramón Nordin Rodriguez
2023-05-26 6:00 ` Parthiban.Veerasooran
2023-05-26 7:14 ` Ramón Nordin Rodriguez
2023-05-26 13:16 ` Parthiban.Veerasooran [this message]
2023-05-24 14:45 ` [PATCH net-next v3 5/6] net: phy: microchip_t1s: remove unnecessary interrupts disabling code Parthiban Veerasooran
2023-05-25 18:30 ` Ramón Nordin Rodriguez
2023-05-24 14:45 ` [PATCH net-next v3 6/6] net: phy: microchip_t1s: add support for Microchip LAN865x Rev.B0 PHYs Parthiban Veerasooran
2023-05-25 1:09 ` Andrew Lunn
2023-05-25 15:16 ` Ramón Nordin Rodriguez
2023-05-26 6:03 ` Parthiban.Veerasooran
2023-05-25 18:32 ` Ramón Nordin Rodriguez
2023-05-25 19:22 ` Ramón Nordin Rodriguez
2023-05-26 6:02 ` Parthiban.Veerasooran
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=37890657-bb37-0327-56d2-6193ac275a0c@microchip.com \
--to=parthiban.veerasooran@microchip.com \
--cc=Horatiu.Vultur@microchip.com \
--cc=Nicolas.Ferre@microchip.com \
--cc=Thorsten.Kummermehr@microchip.com \
--cc=Woojung.Huh@microchip.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=ramon.nordin.rodriguez@ferroamp.se \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®