From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: Miguel Luis <miguel.luis@oracle.com>
Cc: Souvik Chakravarty <Souvik.Chakravarty@arm.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"kvmarm@lists.linux.dev" <kvmarm@lists.linux.dev>,
"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] firmware/psci: Add definitions for PSCI v1.3 specification
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 15:24:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <378d3797a94df5df655d47b3bd733da8853cc2e4.camel@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CB344CC7-E6E2-4325-9669-9BE7EA47C56B@oracle.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1679 bytes --]
On Fri, 2024-09-27 at 12:43 +0000, Miguel Luis wrote:
>
> The common factor being the bit offset in the bitmap for SYSTEM_OFF2 discovery
> and argument to call SYSTEM_OFF2 as well. Would it be clearer something like:
>
> #define PSCI_1_3_HIBERNATE_TYPE_OFF BIT(0)
I've updated the tree at
https://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/linux.git/shortlog/refs/heads/psci-hibernate
to do it that way.
As I did so, I realised that KVM *does* care about the argument to
SYSTEM_OFF2. This is a straight copy of the SYSTEM_RESET2 handling.
Although it doesn't pass the argument up to userspace (presumably
userspace is expected to look at the registers if it cares), it *does*
check it's within the range of permitted values and return
PSCI_RET_INVALID_PARAMS if not.
I've changed that check to:
arg = smccc_get_arg1(vcpu);
/*
* Permit zero to mean HIBERNATE_OFF as well as the bitmap
* form which was introduced in PSCI v1.3 beta.
*/
if (arg && arg != PSCI_1_3_HIBERNATE_TYPE_OFF) {
val = PSCI_RET_INVALID_PARAMS;
break;
}
kvm_psci_system_off2(vcpu);
On the guest side, I've changed the invocation to:
static int psci_sys_hibernate(struct sys_off_data *data)
{
/*
* Zero is an acceptable alternative to PSCI_1_3_HIBERNATE_TYPE_OFF
* and is supported by hypervisors implementing an earlier version
* of the pSCI v1.3 spec.
*/
if (system_entering_hibernation())
invoke_psci_fn(PSCI_FN_NATIVE(1_3, SYSTEM_OFF2),
0 /*PSCI_1_3_HIBERNATE_TYPE_OFF*/, 0, 0);
return NOTIFY_DONE;
}
I'm going to do some careful interop testing with existing and new
hypervisors before reposting this version.
[-- Attachment #2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 5965 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-27 14:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-24 16:05 David Woodhouse
2024-09-24 16:05 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] KVM: arm64: Add PSCI v1.3 SYSTEM_OFF2 function for hibernation David Woodhouse
2024-09-26 9:14 ` Francesco Lavra
2024-09-24 16:05 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] KVM: arm64: Add support for PSCI v1.2 and v1.3 David Woodhouse
2024-09-24 16:05 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] KVM: selftests: Add test for PSCI SYSTEM_OFF2 David Woodhouse
2024-09-24 16:05 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] KVM: arm64: nvhe: Pass through PSCI v1.3 SYSTEM_OFF2 call David Woodhouse
2024-09-24 16:05 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] arm64: Use SYSTEM_OFF2 PSCI call to power off for hibernate David Woodhouse
2024-09-26 9:18 ` Francesco Lavra
2024-09-24 16:13 ` [PATCH v4 0/6] Add PSCI v1.3 SYSTEM_OFF2 support for hibernation David Woodhouse
2024-09-26 8:55 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] firmware/psci: Add definitions for PSCI v1.3 specification Francesco Lavra
2024-09-26 9:59 ` David Woodhouse
2024-09-26 9:56 ` Miguel Luis
2024-09-26 16:30 ` David Woodhouse
2024-09-27 12:43 ` Miguel Luis
2024-09-27 13:20 ` David Woodhouse
2024-09-27 14:24 ` David Woodhouse [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=378d3797a94df5df655d47b3bd733da8853cc2e4.camel@infradead.org \
--to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=Souvik.Chakravarty@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=miguel.luis@oracle.com \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®