From: "anon... anon.al" <anon.asdf@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Nonblocking call may block in a mutex? Nonblocking call after poll may fail?
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 14:13:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <379fb4870708310513o46a721c6l3080179ccbb8f519@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Hi!
This is a driver-related question on non-blocking writes and poll.
Setup:
there is a single output-buffer (in kernel-space) of 24 bytes for
writes from all processes A, B, and C: each process is restricted to
use at most 8 bytes: 8*3 = 24
(until that data is handled (interrupt-handler...))
Question:
If this output-buffer has "4-bytes space remaining for process A",
then a non-blocking write of process A could still encounter a locked
mutex, if process B is busy writing to the output-buffer.
Should process A now block/sleep until that mutex is free and it can
access the output-buffer (and it's 4 bytes space)?
What about a non-blocking (write-) poll of process A: if the poll call
succeeds (the output buffer has space remaining for process A), and
process A now performs a non-blocking write: what happens if A
encounters a blocked mutex, since process B is busy writing to the
output-buffer.
a) Should A block until the mutex is available?
b) Should A return -EAGAIN, even though the poll call succeeded?
c) Should it be impossible for this to happen! i.e. -> should process
A already "have" the mutex in question, when the poll call succeeds
(thus preventing B from writing to the output buffer)
For c) What if process A "has" the mutex, but never does the
non-blocking write. Then no process can write, since the mutex is held
by process A...
I'll appreciate any answer, or pointer to relevant information.
Thanks Albert
next reply other threads:[~2007-08-31 12:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-31 12:13 anon... anon.al [this message]
2007-08-31 14:25 ` anon... anon.al
2007-08-31 14:32 ` Denys Vlasenko
2007-08-31 21:33 ` David Schwartz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=379fb4870708310513o46a721c6l3080179ccbb8f519@mail.gmail.com \
--to=anon.asdf@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®