From: "jiale yao" <19888972804@163.com>
To: "Paul Walmsley" <pjw@kernel.org>,
"Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
"Albert Ou" <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
"Alexandre Ghiti" <alex@ghiti.fr>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re:[PATCH 1/2] riscv: validate RINTC entries before use
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2026 15:25:20 +0800 (CST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <37a131ae.17f0.1a148c03dc7.Coremail.19888972804@163.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261016141249.2791819-2-yaojiale02@163.com>
At 2026-10-16 22:12:47, "Jiale Yao" <yaojiale02@163.com> wrote:
>The RINTC parser reads the flags field before checking that the MADT
>entry contains a complete RINTC structure. A truncated firmware record
>can therefore trigger an out-of-bounds read during early CPU discovery.
>
>Move the existing BAD_MADT_ENTRY() check ahead of the first typed field
>access.
>
Fixes: ce92546cd637 ("RISC-V: smpboot: Add ACPI support in setup_smp()")
>Signed-off-by: Jiale Yao <yaojiale02@163.com>
>---
> arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c
>index a9de2dae804c..9c341398058c 100644
>--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c
>+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c
>@@ -76,6 +76,9 @@ static int __init acpi_parse_rintc(union acpi_subtable_headers *header, const un
> static bool found_boot_cpu;
> struct acpi_madt_rintc *processor = (struct acpi_madt_rintc *)header;
>
>+ if (BAD_MADT_ENTRY(processor, end))
>+ return -EINVAL;
>+
> /*
> * Each RINTC structure in MADT will have a flag. If ACPI_MADT_ENABLED
> * bit in the flag is not enabled, it means OS should not try to enable
>@@ -84,9 +87,6 @@ static int __init acpi_parse_rintc(union acpi_subtable_headers *header, const un
> if (!(processor->flags & ACPI_MADT_ENABLED))
> return 0;
>
>- if (BAD_MADT_ENTRY(processor, end))
>- return -EINVAL;
>-
> acpi_table_print_madt_entry(&header->common);
>
> hart = processor->hart_id;
>--
>2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-17 7:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-16 14:12 [PATCH 0/2] RISC-V: validate ACPI MADT " Jiale Yao
2026-10-16 14:12 ` [PATCH 1/2] riscv: validate RINTC " Jiale Yao
2026-10-17 7:25 ` jiale yao [this message]
2026-10-16 14:12 ` [PATCH 2/2] ACPI: riscv: validate interrupt controller MADT entries Jiale Yao
2026-10-17 7:27 ` jiale yao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=37a131ae.17f0.1a148c03dc7.Coremail.19888972804@163.com \
--to=19888972804@163.com \
--cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=pjw@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®