From: Qais Yousef <qyousef@layalina.io>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] sched/uclamp: Move uclamp_rq_{inc, dec}() from core.c
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2026 01:35:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <37a6df6f-7f25-4acf-a253-d00a40bc796a@layalina.io> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261103005953.56271-5-qyousef@layalina.io>
On 11/3/26 00:59, Qais Yousef wrote:
> @@ -2188,11 +2173,10 @@ void enqueue_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
> update_rq_clock(rq);
>
> /*
> - * Can be before ->enqueue_task() because uclamp considers the
> - * ENQUEUE_DELAYED task before its ->sched_delayed gets cleared
> - * in ->enqueue_task().
> + * Need to be careful what operations are done here, some classes like
> + * fair and RT can enqueue tasks without going through core due to some
> + * features like throttling.
> */
> - uclamp_rq_inc(rq, p, flags);
>
> p->sched_class->enqueue_task(rq, p, flags);
>
> @@ -2222,10 +2206,11 @@ inline bool dequeue_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
> psi_dequeue(p, flags);
>
> /*
> - * Must be before ->dequeue_task() because ->dequeue_task() can 'fail'
> - * and mark the task ->sched_delayed.
> + * Need to be careful what operations are done here, some classes like
> + * fair and RT can dequeue tasks without going through core due to some
> + * features like throttling.
> */
> - uclamp_rq_dec(rq, p);
> +
> return p->sched_class->dequeue_task(rq, p, flags);
> }
psi_enqueue/dequeue() are done at core, not sure how much an impact this has on
it due to throttling dequeueing/enqueueing without going via core and missing
these updates.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-03 1:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-03 0:59 [PATCH v5 0/4] Fix uclamp race against non atomic static key enable Qais Yousef
2026-11-03 0:59 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] sched/uclamp: Fix race condition leading to imbalanced uclamp_rq Qais Yousef
2026-11-03 0:59 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] sched/uclamp: Use wrappers instead of open coding UCLAMP_FLAG_IDLE Qais Yousef
2026-11-03 0:59 ` [PATCH RFC v5 3/4] Revert "sched/rt: Substract number of tasks of throttled queues from rq->nr_running" Qais Yousef
2026-11-03 0:59 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] sched/uclamp: Move uclamp_rq_{inc, dec}() from core.c Qais Yousef
2026-11-03 1:35 ` Qais Yousef [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=37a6df6f-7f25-4acf-a253-d00a40bc796a@layalina.io \
--to=qyousef@layalina.io \
--cc=christian.loehle@arm.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=jstultz@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®