Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] scsi: ufs: Remove support for old UFSHCI versions

[Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>]

On 4/6/24 11:04 PM, Avri Altman wrote:
> UFS spec version 2.1 was published more than 10 years ago. It is
> vanishingly unlikely that even there are out there platforms that uses
> earlier host controllers, let alone that those ancient platforms will
> ever run a V6.10 kernel.  To be extra cautious, leave out support for
> UFSHCI2.0 as well, and just remove support of host controllers prior
> to UFS2.0.
> 
> This patch removes some legacy tuning calls that no longer apply.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>
> Acked-by: Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>
> ---
>   drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c   | 158 +++---------------------------------
>   drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c |   3 +-
>   include/ufs/ufshcd.h        |   2 -
>   include/ufs/ufshci.h        |  13 +--
>   4 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 161 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> index 62c8575f2c67..c72ef87ea867 100644
> --- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> @@ -748,8 +748,6 @@ static int ufshcd_wait_for_register(struct ufs_hba *hba, u32 reg, u32 mask,
>    */
>   static inline u32 ufshcd_get_intr_mask(struct ufs_hba *hba)
>   {
> -	if (hba->ufs_version == ufshci_version(1, 0))
> -		return INTERRUPT_MASK_ALL_VER_10;
>   	if (hba->ufs_version <= ufshci_version(2, 0))
>   		return INTERRUPT_MASK_ALL_VER_11;

Is the patch description in sync with the patch itself? The patch
description says that support for UFSHCI 2.0 is removed while the
above if-condition only evaluates to true for UFSHCI 2.0 and older
controllers.

Thanks,

Bart.