From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2562BECAAD4 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 09:37:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229468AbiH2JhA (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Aug 2022 05:37:00 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45988 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229671AbiH2Jg5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Aug 2022 05:36:57 -0400 Received: from madras.collabora.co.uk (madras.collabora.co.uk [IPv6:2a00:1098:0:82:1000:25:2eeb:e5ab]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 836ED5C977 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 02:36:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (2-237-20-237.ip236.fastwebnet.it [2.237.20.237]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kholk11) by madras.collabora.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D26E06601DB2; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 10:36:54 +0100 (BST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=collabora.com; s=mail; t=1661765815; bh=G158CjfQdiI7n5kAiwB1ffU/Ky0VT1XFLd5k77luxWA=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=aUCjw1mHanhtQiZIpUwNswac5D30YX4kqATo6tlBrvrnN/VykansD2j1scYFIifWT FgKqoBRMqB6jCUk8HuL3+G/2MIakt05+pY/S2b2Bbl+ShoAq+t6f9OPCg0EGYGiX7O sA+QVuiOukSkYgKABLGHKnoTAaO013DUi2VJghsUsOllIQYlsQJmg3nTJkrSB9sDhm ddo/mhaJh9JVlJb4TyxHVPJJ3b40ecfxhW6Adlv5tliZsTSHjPNVkyqS4RvcehzmjP cjKB9i7IhEVNtYzNlRe/P6K76XCPaVkuc5+gs1yOPccSe9tu1wKCE5X7A/Uy460r98 qIax8O3etmI0Q== Message-ID: <37cdcc41-8cfc-443a-a6d7-94b992a0b6f5@collabora.com> Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 11:36:52 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] soc: mediatek: mtk-svs: Use bitfield access macros where possible Content-Language: en-US To: =?UTF-8?B?TsOtY29sYXMgRi4gUi4gQS4gUHJhZG8=?= , Matthias Brugger Cc: roger.lu@mediatek.com, khilman@baylibre.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@collabora.com References: <20220726141653.177948-1-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> <20220726141653.177948-7-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> <20220825185059.xbh3gigksveg4h4u@notapiano> From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno In-Reply-To: <20220825185059.xbh3gigksveg4h4u@notapiano> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Il 25/08/22 20:50, NĂ­colas F. R. A. Prado ha scritto: > On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 03:29:33PM +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote: >> >> >> On 26/07/2022 16:16, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: >>> In order to enhance readability and safety during registers setup >>> and value retrieval, redefine a few register related macros and >>> convert all open-coded instances of bitfield setting/retrieval >>> to use the FIELD_PREP() and FIELD_GET() macros. >>> While at it, some macros were renamed to further enhance readability. >>> >>> This commit brings no functional changes. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno >> >> Does not apply, would you mind to resend together with 1/6? Thanks! > > Hi Matthias, > > Patches 1 and 6 rebased and sent [1]. > > Thanks, > NĂ­colas > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220825184616.2118870-1-nfraprado@collabora.com Uh, sorry for the previous noise - didn't notice this email. Many thanks for timely rebasing the patches! Cheers!