From: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
To: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
HW42 <hw42@ipsumj.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3] xen/balloon: don't online new memory initially
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 09:47:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <37f323bd-8f2b-b7d6-e867-1b3faaa3c3cd@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a35f18d7-3047-ab19-179c-470ea8f3ef3e@oracle.com>
On 03/10/17 23:33, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 10/02/2017 05:37 PM, HW42 wrote:
>> Juergen Gross:
>>> When setting up the Xenstore watch for the memory target size the new
>>> watch will fire at once. Don't try to reach the configured target size
>>> by onlining new memory in this case, as the current memory size will
>>> be smaller in almost all cases due to e.g. BIOS reserved pages.
>>>
>>> Onlining new memory will lead to more problems e.g. undesired conflicts
>>> with NVMe devices meant to be operated as block devices.
>>>
>>> Instead remember the difference between target size and current size
>>> when the watch fires for the first time and apply it to any further
>>> size changes, too.
>>>
>>> In order to avoid races between balloon.c and xen-balloon.c init calls
>>> do the xen-balloon.c initialization from balloon.c.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
>> This patch seems to introduce a regression. If I boot a HVM or PVH
>> domain with memory != maxmem then the kernel inside the domain reports
>> that it has maxmem available even though Xen reports only what is set as
>> memory. Sooner or later Xen logs "out of PoD memory!" and kills the
>> domain. If I revert the corresponding commit (96edd61d) then everything
>> works as expected.
>>
>> Tested this with Xen 4.9.0 and Linux 4.13.4.
>>
>
>
> Yes, this indeed doesn't look like it's doing the right thing (although
> I haven't seen the "out of memory" error).
You need to use enough memory (e.g. via memhog).
> I wonder whether target_diff should be computed against xenstore's
> "static-max" and not "target" and the memory should be ballooned down
> immediately and not on a subsequent watch firing.
Right. And we need to keep target_diff = 0 for PV domains.
Patch coming soon.
Juergen
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-24 7:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-10 8:10 Juergen Gross
2017-07-18 16:08 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-07-18 16:12 ` Juergen Gross
2017-07-18 16:33 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-10-02 21:37 ` [Xen-devel] " HW42
2017-10-03 21:33 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-10-24 7:47 ` Juergen Gross [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=37f323bd-8f2b-b7d6-e867-1b3faaa3c3cd@suse.com \
--to=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=hw42@ipsumj.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome