From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752330AbeDJHDj (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Apr 2018 03:03:39 -0400 Received: from cloudserver094114.home.pl ([79.96.170.134]:40993 "EHLO cloudserver094114.home.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751815AbeDJHDi (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Apr 2018 03:03:38 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Thomas Ilsche Cc: Linux PM , Peter Zijlstra , Frederic Weisbecker , Thomas Gleixner , Paul McKenney , Doug Smythies , Rik van Riel , Aubrey Li , Mike Galbraith , LKML , Len Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/10] sched/cpuidle: Idle loop rework Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 09:03:43 +0200 Message-ID: <380836701.aBTtZlsN1h@aspire.rjw.lan> In-Reply-To: References: <1736751.LdhZHb50jq@aspire.rjw.lan> <1607755.Sz6cLBVOsW@aspire.rjw.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday, April 9, 2018 5:58:32 PM CEST Thomas Ilsche wrote: > > --------------ms020002070802070802040704 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed > Content-Language: en-US > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > On 2018-04-08 18:32, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > The v9 along with some cleanups suggested by Frederic on top of it and = > with > > ACKs from Peter (obtained on IRC) is now available from the pm-cpuidle = > branch > > in the linux-pm.git tree. > >=20 > > It has been added to my linux-next branch, so it probably will be picke= > d up by > > linux-next tomorrow and I have a plan to push it for v4.17 in the secon= > d half > > of the next week unless a major issue with it is found in the meantime.= > > > Great to hear that. Thanks for all your work. You're very welcome! > I'm finishing up some analysis of corner cases, but nothing major. > So I'm glad to see this is moving along. I've been nitpicking a lot, > but this is clearly a huge improvement and there are practical > limitations against a theoretically perfect solution. In any case the > changes will also make future policy adaptions much easier. Thanks for your feedback, it would have taken much more time to get to this point without it. Thanks, Rafael