mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com>
To: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com>
Cc: kevin.tian@intel.com, ashok.raj@intel.com, tiwei.bie@intel.com,
	sanjay.k.kumar@intel.com, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yi.y.sun@intel.com,
	jacob.jun.pan@intel.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/10] vfio/mdev: IOMMU aware mediated device
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 17:22:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <380dc154-5d72-0085-2056-fa466789e1ab@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180830040922.30426-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>

Hi,

On 30/08/2018 05:09, Lu Baolu wrote:
> Below APIs are introduced in the IOMMU glue for device drivers to use
> the finer granularity translation.
> 
> * iommu_capable(IOMMU_CAP_AUX_DOMAIN)
>   - Represents the ability for supporting multiple domains per device
>     (a.k.a. finer granularity translations) of the IOMMU hardware.

iommu_capable() cannot represent hardware capabilities, we need
something else for systems with multiple IOMMUs that have different
caps. How about iommu_domain_get_attr on the device's domain instead?

> * iommu_en(dis)able_aux_domain(struct device *dev)
>   - Enable/disable the multiple domains capability for a device
>     referenced by @dev.
> 
> * iommu_auxiliary_id(struct iommu_domain *domain)
>   - Return the index value used for finer-granularity DMA translation.
>     The specific device driver needs to feed the hardware with this
>     value, so that hardware device could issue the DMA transaction with
>     this value tagged.

This could also reuse iommu_domain_get_attr.


More generally I'm having trouble understanding how auxiliary domains
will be used. So VFIO allocates PASIDs like this:

* iommu_enable_aux_domain(parent_dev)
* iommu_domain_alloc() -> dom1
* iommu_domain_alloc() -> dom2
* iommu_attach_device(dom1, parent_dev)
  -> dom1 gets PASID #1
* iommu_attach_device(dom2, parent_dev)
  -> dom2 gets PASID #2

Then I'm not sure about the next steps, when userspace does
VFIO_IOMMU_MAP_DMA or VFIO_IOMMU_BIND on an mdev's container. Is the
following use accurate?

For the single translation level:
* iommu_map(dom1, ...) updates first-level/second-level pgtables for
PASID #1
* iommu_map(dom2, ...) updates first-level/second-level pgtables for
PASID #2

Nested translation:
* iommu_map(dom1, ...) updates second-level pgtables for PASID #1
* iommu_bind_table(dom1, ...) binds first-level pgtables, provided by
the guest, for PASID #1
* iommu_map(dom2, ...) updates second-level pgtables for PASID #2
* iommu_bind_table(dom2, ...) binds first-level pgtables for PASID #2


I'm trying to understand how to implement this with SMMU and other
IOMMUs. It's not a clean fit since we have a single domain to hold the
second-level pgtables. Then again, the nested case probably doesn't
matter for us - we might as well assign the parent directly, since all
mdevs have the same second-level and can only be assigned to the same VM.


Also, can non-VFIO device drivers use auxiliary domains to do map/unmap
on PASIDs? They are asking to do that and I'm proposing the private
PASID thing, but since aux domains provide a similar feature we should
probably converge somehow.

Thanks,
Jean

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-09-10 16:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-30  4:09 Lu Baolu
2018-08-30  4:09 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/10] iommu: Add APIs for multiple domains per device Lu Baolu
2018-08-30  4:09 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/10] iommu/vt-d: Add multiple domains per device query Lu Baolu
2018-09-05 19:35   ` Alex Williamson
2018-09-06  0:54     ` Lu Baolu
2018-08-30  4:09 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/10] iommu/amd: Add default branch in amd_iommu_capable() Lu Baolu
2018-09-05 19:37   ` Alex Williamson
2018-09-06  0:55     ` Lu Baolu
2018-08-30  4:09 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/10] iommu/vt-d: Enable/disable multiple domains per device Lu Baolu
2018-08-30  4:09 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/10] iommu/vt-d: Attach/detach domains in auxiliary mode Lu Baolu
2018-08-30  4:09 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/10] iommu/vt-d: Return ID associated with an auxiliary domain Lu Baolu
2018-08-30  4:09 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/10] vfio/mdev: Add mediated device domain type Lu Baolu
2018-08-30  4:09 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/10] vfio/type1: Add domain at(de)taching group helpers Lu Baolu
2018-09-10 16:23   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2018-09-12  5:02     ` Lu Baolu
2018-09-12 17:54       ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2018-09-13  0:35         ` Tian, Kevin
2018-09-14 14:45           ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2018-09-15  2:36             ` Tian, Kevin
2018-09-18 15:52               ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
     [not found]                 ` <AADFC41AFE54684AB9EE6CBC0274A5D19130EAD7@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
2018-09-19  2:10                   ` Lu Baolu
2018-09-25 17:55                   ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2018-09-26  2:11                     ` Lu Baolu
2018-08-30  4:09 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/10] vfio/type1: Determine domain type of an mdev group Lu Baolu
2018-08-30  4:09 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/10] vfio/type1: Attach domain for " Lu Baolu
2018-09-05  3:01 ` [RFC PATCH v2 00/10] vfio/mdev: IOMMU aware mediated device Tian, Kevin
2018-09-05 19:15   ` Alex Williamson
2018-09-06  1:29     ` Lu Baolu
2018-09-10 16:22 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker [this message]
2018-09-12  2:42   ` Lu Baolu
2018-09-12 17:54     ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2018-09-13  0:19       ` Tian, Kevin
2018-09-13 15:03         ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2018-09-13 16:55           ` Raj, Ashok
2018-09-14 14:39             ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
     [not found]           ` <AADFC41AFE54684AB9EE6CBC0274A5D191302ECE@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
2018-09-14 14:40             ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2018-09-14 21:04           ` Jacob Pan
2018-09-18 15:46             ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2018-09-19  2:22               ` Tian, Kevin
2018-09-20 15:53                 ` Jacob Pan
2018-09-14  2:46       ` Lu Baolu
2018-09-14  2:53         ` Tian, Kevin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=380dc154-5d72-0085-2056-fa466789e1ab@arm.com \
    --to=jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jacob.jun.pan@intel.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sanjay.k.kumar@intel.com \
    --cc=tiwei.bie@intel.com \
    --cc=yi.y.sun@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®