From: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com>
To: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com>
Cc: kevin.tian@intel.com, ashok.raj@intel.com, tiwei.bie@intel.com,
sanjay.k.kumar@intel.com, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yi.y.sun@intel.com,
jacob.jun.pan@intel.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/10] vfio/mdev: IOMMU aware mediated device
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 17:22:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <380dc154-5d72-0085-2056-fa466789e1ab@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180830040922.30426-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Hi,
On 30/08/2018 05:09, Lu Baolu wrote:
> Below APIs are introduced in the IOMMU glue for device drivers to use
> the finer granularity translation.
>
> * iommu_capable(IOMMU_CAP_AUX_DOMAIN)
> - Represents the ability for supporting multiple domains per device
> (a.k.a. finer granularity translations) of the IOMMU hardware.
iommu_capable() cannot represent hardware capabilities, we need
something else for systems with multiple IOMMUs that have different
caps. How about iommu_domain_get_attr on the device's domain instead?
> * iommu_en(dis)able_aux_domain(struct device *dev)
> - Enable/disable the multiple domains capability for a device
> referenced by @dev.
>
> * iommu_auxiliary_id(struct iommu_domain *domain)
> - Return the index value used for finer-granularity DMA translation.
> The specific device driver needs to feed the hardware with this
> value, so that hardware device could issue the DMA transaction with
> this value tagged.
This could also reuse iommu_domain_get_attr.
More generally I'm having trouble understanding how auxiliary domains
will be used. So VFIO allocates PASIDs like this:
* iommu_enable_aux_domain(parent_dev)
* iommu_domain_alloc() -> dom1
* iommu_domain_alloc() -> dom2
* iommu_attach_device(dom1, parent_dev)
-> dom1 gets PASID #1
* iommu_attach_device(dom2, parent_dev)
-> dom2 gets PASID #2
Then I'm not sure about the next steps, when userspace does
VFIO_IOMMU_MAP_DMA or VFIO_IOMMU_BIND on an mdev's container. Is the
following use accurate?
For the single translation level:
* iommu_map(dom1, ...) updates first-level/second-level pgtables for
PASID #1
* iommu_map(dom2, ...) updates first-level/second-level pgtables for
PASID #2
Nested translation:
* iommu_map(dom1, ...) updates second-level pgtables for PASID #1
* iommu_bind_table(dom1, ...) binds first-level pgtables, provided by
the guest, for PASID #1
* iommu_map(dom2, ...) updates second-level pgtables for PASID #2
* iommu_bind_table(dom2, ...) binds first-level pgtables for PASID #2
I'm trying to understand how to implement this with SMMU and other
IOMMUs. It's not a clean fit since we have a single domain to hold the
second-level pgtables. Then again, the nested case probably doesn't
matter for us - we might as well assign the parent directly, since all
mdevs have the same second-level and can only be assigned to the same VM.
Also, can non-VFIO device drivers use auxiliary domains to do map/unmap
on PASIDs? They are asking to do that and I'm proposing the private
PASID thing, but since aux domains provide a similar feature we should
probably converge somehow.
Thanks,
Jean
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-10 16:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-30 4:09 Lu Baolu
2018-08-30 4:09 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/10] iommu: Add APIs for multiple domains per device Lu Baolu
2018-08-30 4:09 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/10] iommu/vt-d: Add multiple domains per device query Lu Baolu
2018-09-05 19:35 ` Alex Williamson
2018-09-06 0:54 ` Lu Baolu
2018-08-30 4:09 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/10] iommu/amd: Add default branch in amd_iommu_capable() Lu Baolu
2018-09-05 19:37 ` Alex Williamson
2018-09-06 0:55 ` Lu Baolu
2018-08-30 4:09 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/10] iommu/vt-d: Enable/disable multiple domains per device Lu Baolu
2018-08-30 4:09 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/10] iommu/vt-d: Attach/detach domains in auxiliary mode Lu Baolu
2018-08-30 4:09 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/10] iommu/vt-d: Return ID associated with an auxiliary domain Lu Baolu
2018-08-30 4:09 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/10] vfio/mdev: Add mediated device domain type Lu Baolu
2018-08-30 4:09 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/10] vfio/type1: Add domain at(de)taching group helpers Lu Baolu
2018-09-10 16:23 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2018-09-12 5:02 ` Lu Baolu
2018-09-12 17:54 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2018-09-13 0:35 ` Tian, Kevin
2018-09-14 14:45 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2018-09-15 2:36 ` Tian, Kevin
2018-09-18 15:52 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
[not found] ` <AADFC41AFE54684AB9EE6CBC0274A5D19130EAD7@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
2018-09-19 2:10 ` Lu Baolu
2018-09-25 17:55 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2018-09-26 2:11 ` Lu Baolu
2018-08-30 4:09 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/10] vfio/type1: Determine domain type of an mdev group Lu Baolu
2018-08-30 4:09 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/10] vfio/type1: Attach domain for " Lu Baolu
2018-09-05 3:01 ` [RFC PATCH v2 00/10] vfio/mdev: IOMMU aware mediated device Tian, Kevin
2018-09-05 19:15 ` Alex Williamson
2018-09-06 1:29 ` Lu Baolu
2018-09-10 16:22 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker [this message]
2018-09-12 2:42 ` Lu Baolu
2018-09-12 17:54 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2018-09-13 0:19 ` Tian, Kevin
2018-09-13 15:03 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2018-09-13 16:55 ` Raj, Ashok
2018-09-14 14:39 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
[not found] ` <AADFC41AFE54684AB9EE6CBC0274A5D191302ECE@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
2018-09-14 14:40 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2018-09-14 21:04 ` Jacob Pan
2018-09-18 15:46 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2018-09-19 2:22 ` Tian, Kevin
2018-09-20 15:53 ` Jacob Pan
2018-09-14 2:46 ` Lu Baolu
2018-09-14 2:53 ` Tian, Kevin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=380dc154-5d72-0085-2056-fa466789e1ab@arm.com \
--to=jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@intel.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sanjay.k.kumar@intel.com \
--cc=tiwei.bie@intel.com \
--cc=yi.y.sun@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®