From: Zhongqiu Han <zhongqiu.han@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Dawei Li <dawei.li@linux.dev>,
andersson@kernel.org, mathieu.poirier@linaro.org
Cc: linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
set_pte_at@outlook.com, zhongqiu.han@oss.qualcomm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] rpmsg: char: Fix WARN() in error path of rpmsg_eptdev_add()
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2025 12:07:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <38308885-af2e-4b61-9653-00bfca8ca0e9@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251118154107.3100-2-dawei.li@linux.dev>
On 11/18/2025 11:41 PM, Dawei Li wrote:
> put_device() is called on error path of rpmsg_eptdev_add() to cleanup
> resource attached to eptdev->dev, unfortunately it's bogus cause
> dev->release() is not set yet.
>
> When a struct device instance is destroyed, driver core framework checks
> the possible release() callback from candidates below:
> - struct device::release()
> - dev->type->release()
> - dev->class->dev_release()
>
> Rpmsg eptdev owns none of them so WARN() will complain the absence of
> release().
>
> Fix it by:
> - Pre-assign dev->release() before potential error path.
> - Check before ida_free() in dev->release().
>
> By fixing error path of rpmsg_eptdev_add() and fixing potential memory
> leak in rpmsg_anonymous_eptdev_create(), this work paves the way of rework
> of rpmsg_eptdev_add() and its callers.
>
> Fixes: c0cdc19f84a4 ("rpmsg: Driver for user space endpoint interface")
> Signed-off-by: Dawei Li <dawei.li@linux.dev>
> ---
> drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c
> index 34b35ea74aab..373b627581e8 100644
> --- a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c
> +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c
> @@ -408,8 +408,13 @@ static void rpmsg_eptdev_release_device(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct rpmsg_eptdev *eptdev = dev_to_eptdev(dev);
>
> - ida_free(&rpmsg_ept_ida, dev->id);
> - if (eptdev->dev.devt)
> + /*
> + * release() can be invoked from error path of rpmsg_eptdev_add(),
> + * WARN() will be fired if ida_free() is feed with invalid ID.
> + */
> + if (likely(ida_exists(&rpmsg_ept_ida, dev->id)))
> + ida_free(&rpmsg_ept_ida, dev->id);
> + if (eptdev->dev.devt && likely(ida_exists(&rpmsg_minor_ida, MINOR(eptdev->dev.devt))))
> ida_free(&rpmsg_minor_ida, MINOR(eptdev->dev.devt));
> kfree(eptdev);
> }
> @@ -458,6 +463,8 @@ static int rpmsg_eptdev_add(struct rpmsg_eptdev *eptdev,
> struct device *dev = &eptdev->dev;
> int ret;
>
> + dev->release = rpmsg_eptdev_release_device;
> +
> eptdev->chinfo = chinfo;
>
> if (cdev) {
> @@ -471,7 +478,7 @@ static int rpmsg_eptdev_add(struct rpmsg_eptdev *eptdev,
> /* Anonymous inode device still need device name for dev_err() and friends */
> ret = ida_alloc(&rpmsg_ept_ida, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (ret < 0)
> - goto free_minor_ida;
> + goto free_eptdev;
> dev->id = ret;
> dev_set_name(dev, "rpmsg%d", ret);
>
> @@ -480,22 +487,13 @@ static int rpmsg_eptdev_add(struct rpmsg_eptdev *eptdev,
> if (cdev) {
> ret = cdev_device_add(&eptdev->cdev, &eptdev->dev);
> if (ret)
> - goto free_ept_ida;
> + goto free_eptdev;
> }
>
> - /* We can now rely on the release function for cleanup */
> - dev->release = rpmsg_eptdev_release_device;
> -
> return ret;
>
> -free_ept_ida:
> - ida_free(&rpmsg_ept_ida, dev->id);
> -free_minor_ida:
> - if (cdev)
> - ida_free(&rpmsg_minor_ida, MINOR(dev->devt));
> free_eptdev:
> put_device(dev);
> - kfree(eptdev);
Hi Dawei,
Thanks for your new version~
Patch 1/3 will introduce a use-after-free of eptdev in func
rpmsg_anonymous_eptdev_create(),
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/remoteproc/linux.git/tree/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_char.c?h=for-next#n548
even though this issue will be resolved in 2/3. However, 1/3, as an
independent commit, should not introduce a new bug.
>
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -561,6 +559,8 @@ int rpmsg_anonymous_eptdev_create(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, struct device *par
>
> if (!ret)
> *pfd = fd;
> + else
> + put_device(&eptdev->dev);
>
> return ret;
> }
--
Thx and BRs,
Zhongqiu Han
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-19 4:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-18 15:41 [PATCH v4 0/3] Fixes and rework " Dawei Li
2025-11-18 15:41 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] rpmsg: char: Fix WARN() in error path " Dawei Li
2025-11-19 4:07 ` Zhongqiu Han [this message]
2025-11-19 10:56 ` Dawei Li
2025-11-19 12:26 ` Zhongqiu Han
2025-11-19 17:14 ` Mathieu Poirier
2025-11-18 15:41 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] rpmsg: char: Rework of rpmsg_eptdev_add() and its callers Dawei Li
2025-11-19 13:03 ` Zhongqiu Han
2025-11-18 15:41 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] rpmsg: char: Merge cdev branches in rpmsg_eptdev_add() Dawei Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=38308885-af2e-4b61-9653-00bfca8ca0e9@oss.qualcomm.com \
--to=zhongqiu.han@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=dawei.li@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=set_pte_at@outlook.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®