From: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
To: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
Cc: christian.loehle@arm.com, tj@kernel.org, pavel@kernel.org,
len.brown@intel.com, rafael@kernel.org, kernel-dev@igalia.com,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, sched-ext@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/10] PM: EM: Assign a unique ID when creating a performance domain
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2025 09:41:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <38452b7c-21f2-457d-af1a-13f9edc2ebaa@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251014001055.772422-2-changwoo@igalia.com>
On 10/14/25 01:10, Changwoo Min wrote:
> It is necessary to refer to a specific performance domain from a
> userspace. For example, the energy model of a particular performance
> domain is updated.
>
> To this end, assign a unique ID to each performance domain to address it,
> and manage them in a global linked list to look up a specific one by
> matching ID. IDA is used for ID assignment, and the mutex is used to
> protect the global list from concurrent access.
>
> Note that the mutex (em_pd_list_mutex) is not supposed to hold while
> holding em_pd_mutex to avoid ABBA deadlock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
> ---
> include/linux/energy_model.h | 4 ++++
> kernel/power/energy_model.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/energy_model.h b/include/linux/energy_model.h
> index 61d50571ad88..43aa6153dc57 100644
> --- a/include/linux/energy_model.h
> +++ b/include/linux/energy_model.h
> @@ -54,6 +54,8 @@ struct em_perf_table {
> /**
> * struct em_perf_domain - Performance domain
> * @em_table: Pointer to the runtime modifiable em_perf_table
> + * @node: node in em_pd_list (in energy_model.c)
> + * @id: A unique ID number for each performance domain
> * @nr_perf_states: Number of performance states
> * @min_perf_state: Minimum allowed Performance State index
> * @max_perf_state: Maximum allowed Performance State index
> @@ -71,6 +73,8 @@ struct em_perf_table {
> */
> struct em_perf_domain {
> struct em_perf_table __rcu *em_table;
> + struct list_head node;
> + int id;
> int nr_perf_states;
> int min_perf_state;
> int max_perf_state;
> diff --git a/kernel/power/energy_model.c b/kernel/power/energy_model.c
> index 5f17d2e8e954..2047b546ad11 100644
> --- a/kernel/power/energy_model.c
> +++ b/kernel/power/energy_model.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,16 @@
> */
> static DEFINE_MUTEX(em_pd_mutex);
>
> +/*
> + * Manage performance domains with IDs. One can iterate the performance domains
> + * through the list and pick one with their associated ID. The mutex serializes
> + * the list access. When holding em_pd_list_mutex, em_pd_mutex should not be
> + * taken to avoid potential deadlock.
> + */
> +static DEFINE_IDA(em_pd_ida);
> +static LIST_HEAD(em_pd_list);
> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(em_pd_list_mutex);
> +
> static void em_cpufreq_update_efficiencies(struct device *dev,
> struct em_perf_state *table);
> static void em_check_capacity_update(void);
> @@ -396,7 +406,7 @@ static int em_create_pd(struct device *dev, int nr_states,
> struct em_perf_table *em_table;
> struct em_perf_domain *pd;
> struct device *cpu_dev;
> - int cpu, ret, num_cpus;
> + int cpu, ret, num_cpus, id;
>
> if (_is_cpu_device(dev)) {
> num_cpus = cpumask_weight(cpus);
> @@ -420,6 +430,13 @@ static int em_create_pd(struct device *dev, int nr_states,
>
> pd->nr_perf_states = nr_states;
>
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pd->node);
> +
> + id = ida_alloc(&em_pd_ida, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (id < 0)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + pd->id = id;
> +
> em_table = em_table_alloc(pd);
> if (!em_table)
> goto free_pd;
> @@ -444,6 +461,7 @@ static int em_create_pd(struct device *dev, int nr_states,
> kfree(em_table);
> free_pd:
> kfree(pd);
> + ida_free(&em_pd_ida, id);
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> @@ -660,6 +678,10 @@ int em_dev_register_pd_no_update(struct device *dev, unsigned int nr_states,
> unlock:
> mutex_unlock(&em_pd_mutex);
>
> + mutex_lock(&em_pd_list_mutex);
> + list_add_tail(&dev->em_pd->node, &em_pd_list);
> + mutex_unlock(&em_pd_list_mutex);
> +
> return ret;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(em_dev_register_pd_no_update);
> @@ -678,6 +700,10 @@ void em_dev_unregister_perf_domain(struct device *dev)
> if (_is_cpu_device(dev))
> return;
>
> + mutex_lock(&em_pd_list_mutex);
> + list_del_init(&dev->em_pd->node);
> + mutex_unlock(&em_pd_list_mutex);
> +
> /*
> * The mutex separates all register/unregister requests and protects
> * from potential clean-up/setup issues in the debugfs directories.
> @@ -689,6 +715,8 @@ void em_dev_unregister_perf_domain(struct device *dev)
> em_table_free(rcu_dereference_protected(dev->em_pd->em_table,
> lockdep_is_held(&em_pd_mutex)));
>
> + ida_free(&em_pd_ida, dev->em_pd->id);
> +
> kfree(dev->em_pd);
> dev->em_pd = NULL;
> mutex_unlock(&em_pd_mutex);
LGTM,
Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-14 8:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-14 0:10 [PATCH v5 00/10] PM: EM: Add netlink support for the energy model Changwoo Min
2025-10-14 0:10 ` [PATCH v5 01/10] PM: EM: Assign a unique ID when creating a performance domain Changwoo Min
2025-10-14 8:41 ` Lukasz Luba [this message]
2025-10-14 0:10 ` [PATCH v5 02/10] PM: EM: Expose the ID of a performance domain via debugfs Changwoo Min
2025-10-14 0:10 ` [PATCH v5 03/10] PM: EM: Add em.yaml and autogen files Changwoo Min
2025-10-14 0:10 ` [PATCH v5 04/10] PM: EM: Add a skeleton code for netlink notification Changwoo Min
2025-10-14 8:43 ` Lukasz Luba
2025-10-14 0:10 ` [PATCH v5 05/10] PM: EM: Add an iterator and accessor for the performance domain Changwoo Min
2025-10-14 8:45 ` Lukasz Luba
2025-10-15 4:49 ` kernel test robot
2025-10-20 17:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-10-20 21:35 ` Changwoo Min
2025-10-14 0:10 ` [PATCH v5 06/10] PM: EM: Implement em_nl_get_pds_doit() Changwoo Min
2025-10-14 0:10 ` [PATCH v5 07/10] PM: EM: Implement em_nl_get_pd_table_doit() Changwoo Min
2025-10-14 0:10 ` [PATCH v5 08/10] PM: EM: Implement em_notify_pd_deleted() Changwoo Min
2025-10-14 8:47 ` Lukasz Luba
2025-10-15 4:16 ` kernel test robot
2025-10-20 17:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-10-14 0:10 ` [PATCH v5 09/10] PM: EM: Implement em_notify_pd_created/updated() Changwoo Min
2025-10-14 8:48 ` Lukasz Luba
2025-10-14 0:10 ` [PATCH v5 10/10] PM: EM: Notify an event when the performance domain changes Changwoo Min
2025-10-14 8:54 ` [PATCH v5 00/10] PM: EM: Add netlink support for the energy model Lukasz Luba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=38452b7c-21f2-457d-af1a-13f9edc2ebaa@arm.com \
--to=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=christian.loehle@arm.com \
--cc=kernel-dev@igalia.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®