From: Christophe LEROY <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
To: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] powerpc: Implement csum_ipv6_magic in assembly
Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 08:20:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3848a4ad-2c0e-691f-e98f-347cfe3484e8@c-s.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180523183447.GV17342@gate.crashing.org>
Le 23/05/2018 à 20:34, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
> On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 08:57:01AM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>> The generic csum_ipv6_magic() generates a pretty bad result
>
> <snip>
>
> Please try with a more recent compiler, what you used is pretty ancient.
> It's not like recent compilers do great on this either, but it's not
> *that* bad anymore ;-)
>
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/lib/checksum_32.S
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/checksum_32.S
>> @@ -293,3 +293,36 @@ dst_error:
>> EX_TABLE(51b, dst_error);
>>
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(csum_partial_copy_generic)
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * static inline __sum16 csum_ipv6_magic(const struct in6_addr *saddr,
>> + * const struct in6_addr *daddr,
>> + * __u32 len, __u8 proto, __wsum sum)
>> + */
>> +
>> +_GLOBAL(csum_ipv6_magic)
>> + lwz r8, 0(r3)
>> + lwz r9, 4(r3)
>> + lwz r10, 8(r3)
>> + lwz r11, 12(r3)
>> + addc r0, r5, r6
>> + adde r0, r0, r7
>> + adde r0, r0, r8
>> + adde r0, r0, r9
>> + adde r0, r0, r10
>> + adde r0, r0, r11
>> + lwz r8, 0(r4)
>> + lwz r9, 4(r4)
>> + lwz r10, 8(r4)
>> + lwz r11, 12(r4)
>> + adde r0, r0, r8
>> + adde r0, r0, r9
>> + adde r0, r0, r10
>> + adde r0, r0, r11
>> + addze r0, r0
>> + rotlwi r3, r0, 16
>> + add r3, r0, r3
>> + not r3, r3
>> + rlwinm r3, r3, 16, 16, 31
>> + blr
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(csum_ipv6_magic)
>
> Clustering the loads and carry insns together is pretty much the worst you
> can do on most 32-bit CPUs.
Oh, really ? __csum_partial is written that way too.
Right, now I tried interleaving the lwz and adde. I get no improvment at
all on a 885, but I get a 15% improvment on a 8321.
Christophe
>
>
> Segher
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-24 6:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-22 6:57 Christophe Leroy
2018-05-23 18:34 ` Segher Boessenkool
2018-05-24 6:20 ` Christophe LEROY [this message]
2018-05-24 10:18 ` Christophe Leroy
2018-05-24 19:55 ` Segher Boessenkool
2018-05-24 19:42 ` Segher Boessenkool
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3848a4ad-2c0e-691f-e98f-347cfe3484e8@c-s.fr \
--to=christophe.leroy@c-s.fr \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®