mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christophe LEROY <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
To: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] powerpc: Implement csum_ipv6_magic in assembly
Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 08:20:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3848a4ad-2c0e-691f-e98f-347cfe3484e8@c-s.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180523183447.GV17342@gate.crashing.org>



Le 23/05/2018 à 20:34, Segher Boessenkool a écrit :
> On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 08:57:01AM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>> The generic csum_ipv6_magic() generates a pretty bad result
> 
> <snip>
> 
> Please try with a more recent compiler, what you used is pretty ancient.
> It's not like recent compilers do great on this either, but it's not
> *that* bad anymore ;-)
> 
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/lib/checksum_32.S
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/checksum_32.S
>> @@ -293,3 +293,36 @@ dst_error:
>>   	EX_TABLE(51b, dst_error);
>>   
>>   EXPORT_SYMBOL(csum_partial_copy_generic)
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * static inline __sum16 csum_ipv6_magic(const struct in6_addr *saddr,
>> + *				      const struct in6_addr *daddr,
>> + *				      __u32 len, __u8 proto, __wsum sum)
>> + */
>> +
>> +_GLOBAL(csum_ipv6_magic)
>> +	lwz	r8, 0(r3)
>> +	lwz	r9, 4(r3)
>> +	lwz	r10, 8(r3)
>> +	lwz	r11, 12(r3)
>> +	addc	r0, r5, r6
>> +	adde	r0, r0, r7
>> +	adde	r0, r0, r8
>> +	adde	r0, r0, r9
>> +	adde	r0, r0, r10
>> +	adde	r0, r0, r11
>> +	lwz	r8, 0(r4)
>> +	lwz	r9, 4(r4)
>> +	lwz	r10, 8(r4)
>> +	lwz	r11, 12(r4)
>> +	adde	r0, r0, r8
>> +	adde	r0, r0, r9
>> +	adde	r0, r0, r10
>> +	adde	r0, r0, r11
>> +	addze	r0, r0
>> +	rotlwi	r3, r0, 16
>> +	add	r3, r0, r3
>> +	not	r3, r3
>> +	rlwinm	r3, r3, 16, 16, 31
>> +	blr
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(csum_ipv6_magic)
> 
> Clustering the loads and carry insns together is pretty much the worst you
> can do on most 32-bit CPUs.

Oh, really ? __csum_partial is written that way too.

Right, now I tried interleaving the lwz and adde. I get no improvment at 
all on a 885, but I get a 15% improvment on a 8321.

Christophe

> 
> 
> Segher
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-24  6:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-22  6:57 Christophe Leroy
2018-05-23 18:34 ` Segher Boessenkool
2018-05-24  6:20   ` Christophe LEROY [this message]
2018-05-24 10:18     ` Christophe Leroy
2018-05-24 19:55       ` Segher Boessenkool
2018-05-24 19:42     ` Segher Boessenkool

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3848a4ad-2c0e-691f-e98f-347cfe3484e8@c-s.fr \
    --to=christophe.leroy@c-s.fr \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®