mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
To: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@linux.dev>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	Christophe Leroy <chleroy@kernel.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
	Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
	Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/11] mm/sparse-vmemmap: switch device DAX to shared tail vmemmap pages
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2026 12:09:24 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3856ab3a-5bc6-4483-a116-601ae431b2c1@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260908030335.96549-7-songmuchun@bytedance.com>



On 2026/9/8 11:03, Muchun Song wrote:
> HugeTLB vmemmap optimization now uses per-zone shared tail vmemmap pages.
> Device DAX has not been switched to that mechanism yet.
>
> Switch device DAX to vmemmap_shared_tail_page() as well. This aligns DAX
> with HugeTLB by using the common per-zone shared tail vmemmap page.
>
> The optimization is enabled only for DEV-DAX through pgmap->vmemmap_shift,
> which is assigned when a DEV-DAX device is initialized. Unlike FS-DAX,
> DEV-DAX does not modify tail struct pages, so sharing them is safe.
>
> Since the shared tail page can now back ZONE_DEVICE vmemmap mappings,
> initialize its entries with PG_reserved for device zones. Also skip
> poisoning vmemmap-optimizable sections while their struct pages may be
> shared.
>
> Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
> ---
> v2:
> - Explain why sharing tail vmemmap pages is safe for DEV-DAX
>    (suggested by Qi Zheng)
> ---
>   include/linux/mmzone.h | 10 +++++++++
>   mm/memory_hotplug.c    |  5 +++--
>   mm/sparse-vmemmap.c    | 47 ++++++++++++++----------------------------
>   3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> index d3778ba976a5..03ed9232f186 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> @@ -1686,11 +1686,21 @@ static inline bool zone_is_zone_device(const struct zone *zone)
>   {
>   	return zone_idx(zone) == ZONE_DEVICE;
>   }
> +
> +static inline struct zone *device_zone(int nid)
> +{
> +	return &NODE_DATA(nid)->node_zones[ZONE_DEVICE];
> +}
>   #else
>   static inline bool zone_is_zone_device(const struct zone *zone)
>   {
>   	return false;
>   }
> +
> +static inline struct zone *device_zone(int nid)
> +{
> +	return NULL;
> +}
>   #endif
>   
>   /*
> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> index b428da66d279..0db0379826df 100644
> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> @@ -554,8 +554,9 @@ void remove_pfn_range_from_zone(struct zone *zone,
>   		/* Select all remaining pages up to the next section boundary */
>   		cur_nr_pages =
>   			min(end_pfn - pfn, SECTION_ALIGN_UP(pfn + 1) - pfn);
> -		page_init_poison(pfn_to_page(pfn),
> -				 sizeof(struct page) * cur_nr_pages);
> +		if (!section_vmemmap_optimizable(__pfn_to_section(pfn)))
> +			page_init_poison(pfn_to_page(pfn),
> +					 sizeof(struct page) * cur_nr_pages);
>   	}
>   
>   	/*
> diff --git a/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c b/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c
> index aed1e7429daa..0201877a7f80 100644
> --- a/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c
> +++ b/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c
> @@ -193,6 +193,8 @@ struct page __ref *vmemmap_shared_tail_page(unsigned int order, struct zone *zon
>   		set_page_node(page, zone_to_nid(zone));
>   		set_page_zone(page, zone_idx(zone));
>   		prep_compound_tail(page, NULL, order);
> +		if (zone_is_zone_device(zone))
> +			__SetPageReserved(page);

Sashiko said: "
   Could setting PG_reserved here cause a use-after-free
   during device hot-remove?

   When a DEV-DAX device is removed and vmemmap_free is called,
   remove_pte_table calls free_vmemmap_pages. In free_vmemmap_pages,
   the PG_reserved flag redirects execution:

   arch/x86/mm/init_64.c:free_vmemmap_pages() {
       ...
       else if (PageReserved(page))
           free_reserved_pages(page, order);
   }

   Does this forcefully drop the refcount and free the shared
   page to the buddy allocator, leaving a dangling pointer in
   zone->vmemmap_tails[idx] that breaks other DAX devices
   sharing this page?
"

It is a false positive.

The struct page marked reserved here is an entry stored
inside the shared vmemmap backing page; after mapping, it
represents a Device DAX tail page. It is not the struct
page describing the backing page itself.

remove_pte_table() passes pte_page(*pte) to free_vmemmap_pages(),
which is the latter. The runtime-allocated backing page is
not reserved, so removal takes the __free_pages() path. Each
reused PTE takes a reference via get_page(), and removal
drops one such reference, while the allocation reference
retained by zone->vmemmap_tails[] remains. Therefore removing
one DAX device does not free the shared backing page or leave
a dangling pointer.

>   	}
>   
>   	page = virt_to_page(addr);
> @@ -490,23 +492,6 @@ static bool __meminit reuse_compound_section(unsigned long start_pfn,
>   	return !IS_ALIGNED(offset, nr_pages) && nr_pages > PAGES_PER_SUBSECTION;
>   }
>   
> -static pte_t * __meminit compound_section_tail_page(unsigned long addr)
> -{
> -	pte_t *pte;
> -
> -	addr -= PAGE_SIZE;
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * Assuming sections are populated sequentially, the previous section's
> -	 * page data can be reused.
> -	 */
> -	pte = pte_offset_kernel(pmd_off_k(addr), addr);
> -	if (!pte)
> -		return NULL;
> -
> -	return pte;
> -}
> -
>   static int __meminit vmemmap_populate_compound_pages(unsigned long start_pfn,
>   						     unsigned long start,
>   						     unsigned long end, int node,
> @@ -516,21 +501,18 @@ static int __meminit vmemmap_populate_compound_pages(unsigned long start_pfn,
>   	pte_t *pte;
>   	int rc;
>   	unsigned long flags = VMEMMAP_POPULATE_DAX;
> +	struct page *page;
> +	unsigned int order = pfn_to_section_order(start_pfn);
>   
> -	if (reuse_compound_section(start_pfn, pgmap)) {
> -		pte = compound_section_tail_page(start);
> -		if (!pte)
> -			return -ENOMEM;
> +	page = vmemmap_shared_tail_page(order, device_zone(node));
> +	if (!page)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
>   
> -		/*
> -		 * Reuse the page that was populated in the prior iteration
> -		 * with just tail struct pages.
> -		 */
> +	if (reuse_compound_section(start_pfn, pgmap))
>   		return vmemmap_populate_range(start, end, node, NULL,
> -					      pte_pfn(ptep_get(pte)), flags);
> -	}
> +					      page_to_pfn(page), flags);
>   
> -	size = min(end - start, pgmap_vmemmap_nr(pgmap) * sizeof(struct page));
> +	size = min(end - start, (1UL << order) * sizeof(struct page));
>   	for (addr = start; addr < end; addr += size) {
>   		unsigned long next, last = addr + size;
>   
> @@ -546,12 +528,12 @@ static int __meminit vmemmap_populate_compound_pages(unsigned long start_pfn,
>   			return -ENOMEM;
>   
>   		/*
> -		 * Reuse the previous page for the rest of tail pages
> +		 * Reuse the shared page for the rest of tail pages
>   		 * See layout diagram in Documentation/mm/vmemmap_dedup.rst
>   		 */
>   		next += PAGE_SIZE;
>   		rc = vmemmap_populate_range(next, last, node, NULL,
> -					    pte_pfn(ptep_get(pte)), flags);
> +					    page_to_pfn(page), flags);

Another report is like:

"
   When this shared tail page is used to back the
   DEV-DAX tail pages, could concurrent initialization
   corrupt the compound_head pointer for the entire
   node?

   Looking at memmap_init_zone_device which calls
   memmap_init_compound, the head page template is copied
   unconditionally into the tail pages:

   mm/mm_init.c:memmap_init_compound() {
       for (pfn = head_pfn + 2; pfn < end_pfn; pfn++)
           zone_device_page_init_from_template(pfn_to_page(pfn), pfn, 
&template);
   }

   Since page_to_pfn(page) here points to a node-wide
   shared physical page, would this template copy overwrite
   the compound_head for all DEV-DAX tail pages on the node
   to point to the latest initialized PMD's head page?
"

This is also a false positive.

memmap_init_compound() does not initialize the full
compound range when the section uses vmemmap optimization.
compound_nr_pages() limits it to:

   2 * PAGE_SIZE / sizeof(struct page)

i.e. exactly the entries in the retained vmemmap page.
The shared mappings start at addr + PAGE_SIZE, so the
template-copy loop stops before reaching them.

Thanks
Muchun

>   		if (rc)
>   			return -ENOMEM;
>   	}
> @@ -883,13 +865,14 @@ int __meminit sparse_add_section(int nid, unsigned long start_pfn,
>   	if (IS_ERR(memmap))
>   		return PTR_ERR(memmap);
>   
> +	ms = __nr_to_section(section_nr);
>   	/*
>   	 * Poison uninitialized struct pages in order to catch invalid flags
>   	 * combinations.
>   	 */
> -	page_init_poison(memmap, sizeof(struct page) * nr_pages);
> +	if (!section_vmemmap_optimizable(ms))
> +		page_init_poison(memmap, sizeof(struct page) * nr_pages);
>   
> -	ms = __nr_to_section(section_nr);
>   	__section_mark_present(ms, section_nr);
>   
>   	/* Align memmap to section boundary in the subsection case */


  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-08  4:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-08  3:03 [PATCH v2 00/11] mm: Switch device DAX to section-based vmemmap optimization Muchun Song
2026-09-08  3:03 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] mm/sparse-vmemmap: introduce CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP_OPTIMIZATION Muchun Song
2026-09-08  3:03 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] mm/sparse-vmemmap: factor out shared vmemmap tail page allocation Muchun Song
2026-09-08  3:03 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] mm/sparse-vmemmap: open-code init_compound_tail() Muchun Song
2026-09-10  7:50   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-09-08  3:03 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] mm/sparse-vmemmap: prepare DAX vmemmap population for section orders Muchun Song
2026-09-08  3:03 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] mm/sparse-vmemmap: set section order for device DAX Muchun Song
2026-09-08  3:03 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] mm/sparse-vmemmap: switch device DAX to shared tail vmemmap pages Muchun Song
2026-09-08  4:09   ` Muchun Song [this message]
2026-09-08  7:46   ` Qi Zheng
2026-09-08  8:34     ` Muchun Song
2026-09-08  3:03 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] mm/sparse-vmemmap: move HVO helpers to a public header Muchun Song
2026-09-08  8:19   ` Qi Zheng
2026-09-08  3:03 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] powerpc/mm: switch device DAX to shared tail vmemmap pages Muchun Song
2026-09-08  3:03 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] mm/sparse-vmemmap: drop the extra tail page from device DAX reservation Muchun Song
2026-09-08  9:09   ` Qi Zheng
2026-09-08  9:12     ` Muchun Song
2026-09-08  3:03 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] mm/sparse-vmemmap: drop unused section_nr_vmemmap_pages() arguments Muchun Song
2026-09-08  9:23   ` Qi Zheng
2026-09-08  3:03 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] Documentation/mm: update DAX vmemmap deduplication docs Muchun Song
2026-09-08  9:29   ` Qi Zheng
2026-09-09  1:45 ` [PATCH v2 00/11] mm: Switch device DAX to section-based vmemmap optimization Andrew Morton
2026-09-10  6:48   ` Muchun Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3856ab3a-5bc6-4483-a116-601ae431b2c1@linux.dev \
    --to=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®