From: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
To: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@linux.dev>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Christophe Leroy <chleroy@kernel.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/11] mm/sparse-vmemmap: switch device DAX to shared tail vmemmap pages
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2026 12:09:24 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3856ab3a-5bc6-4483-a116-601ae431b2c1@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260908030335.96549-7-songmuchun@bytedance.com>
On 2026/9/8 11:03, Muchun Song wrote:
> HugeTLB vmemmap optimization now uses per-zone shared tail vmemmap pages.
> Device DAX has not been switched to that mechanism yet.
>
> Switch device DAX to vmemmap_shared_tail_page() as well. This aligns DAX
> with HugeTLB by using the common per-zone shared tail vmemmap page.
>
> The optimization is enabled only for DEV-DAX through pgmap->vmemmap_shift,
> which is assigned when a DEV-DAX device is initialized. Unlike FS-DAX,
> DEV-DAX does not modify tail struct pages, so sharing them is safe.
>
> Since the shared tail page can now back ZONE_DEVICE vmemmap mappings,
> initialize its entries with PG_reserved for device zones. Also skip
> poisoning vmemmap-optimizable sections while their struct pages may be
> shared.
>
> Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
> ---
> v2:
> - Explain why sharing tail vmemmap pages is safe for DEV-DAX
> (suggested by Qi Zheng)
> ---
> include/linux/mmzone.h | 10 +++++++++
> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 5 +++--
> mm/sparse-vmemmap.c | 47 ++++++++++++++----------------------------
> 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> index d3778ba976a5..03ed9232f186 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> @@ -1686,11 +1686,21 @@ static inline bool zone_is_zone_device(const struct zone *zone)
> {
> return zone_idx(zone) == ZONE_DEVICE;
> }
> +
> +static inline struct zone *device_zone(int nid)
> +{
> + return &NODE_DATA(nid)->node_zones[ZONE_DEVICE];
> +}
> #else
> static inline bool zone_is_zone_device(const struct zone *zone)
> {
> return false;
> }
> +
> +static inline struct zone *device_zone(int nid)
> +{
> + return NULL;
> +}
> #endif
>
> /*
> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> index b428da66d279..0db0379826df 100644
> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> @@ -554,8 +554,9 @@ void remove_pfn_range_from_zone(struct zone *zone,
> /* Select all remaining pages up to the next section boundary */
> cur_nr_pages =
> min(end_pfn - pfn, SECTION_ALIGN_UP(pfn + 1) - pfn);
> - page_init_poison(pfn_to_page(pfn),
> - sizeof(struct page) * cur_nr_pages);
> + if (!section_vmemmap_optimizable(__pfn_to_section(pfn)))
> + page_init_poison(pfn_to_page(pfn),
> + sizeof(struct page) * cur_nr_pages);
> }
>
> /*
> diff --git a/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c b/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c
> index aed1e7429daa..0201877a7f80 100644
> --- a/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c
> +++ b/mm/sparse-vmemmap.c
> @@ -193,6 +193,8 @@ struct page __ref *vmemmap_shared_tail_page(unsigned int order, struct zone *zon
> set_page_node(page, zone_to_nid(zone));
> set_page_zone(page, zone_idx(zone));
> prep_compound_tail(page, NULL, order);
> + if (zone_is_zone_device(zone))
> + __SetPageReserved(page);
Sashiko said: "
Could setting PG_reserved here cause a use-after-free
during device hot-remove?
When a DEV-DAX device is removed and vmemmap_free is called,
remove_pte_table calls free_vmemmap_pages. In free_vmemmap_pages,
the PG_reserved flag redirects execution:
arch/x86/mm/init_64.c:free_vmemmap_pages() {
...
else if (PageReserved(page))
free_reserved_pages(page, order);
}
Does this forcefully drop the refcount and free the shared
page to the buddy allocator, leaving a dangling pointer in
zone->vmemmap_tails[idx] that breaks other DAX devices
sharing this page?
"
It is a false positive.
The struct page marked reserved here is an entry stored
inside the shared vmemmap backing page; after mapping, it
represents a Device DAX tail page. It is not the struct
page describing the backing page itself.
remove_pte_table() passes pte_page(*pte) to free_vmemmap_pages(),
which is the latter. The runtime-allocated backing page is
not reserved, so removal takes the __free_pages() path. Each
reused PTE takes a reference via get_page(), and removal
drops one such reference, while the allocation reference
retained by zone->vmemmap_tails[] remains. Therefore removing
one DAX device does not free the shared backing page or leave
a dangling pointer.
> }
>
> page = virt_to_page(addr);
> @@ -490,23 +492,6 @@ static bool __meminit reuse_compound_section(unsigned long start_pfn,
> return !IS_ALIGNED(offset, nr_pages) && nr_pages > PAGES_PER_SUBSECTION;
> }
>
> -static pte_t * __meminit compound_section_tail_page(unsigned long addr)
> -{
> - pte_t *pte;
> -
> - addr -= PAGE_SIZE;
> -
> - /*
> - * Assuming sections are populated sequentially, the previous section's
> - * page data can be reused.
> - */
> - pte = pte_offset_kernel(pmd_off_k(addr), addr);
> - if (!pte)
> - return NULL;
> -
> - return pte;
> -}
> -
> static int __meminit vmemmap_populate_compound_pages(unsigned long start_pfn,
> unsigned long start,
> unsigned long end, int node,
> @@ -516,21 +501,18 @@ static int __meminit vmemmap_populate_compound_pages(unsigned long start_pfn,
> pte_t *pte;
> int rc;
> unsigned long flags = VMEMMAP_POPULATE_DAX;
> + struct page *page;
> + unsigned int order = pfn_to_section_order(start_pfn);
>
> - if (reuse_compound_section(start_pfn, pgmap)) {
> - pte = compound_section_tail_page(start);
> - if (!pte)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> + page = vmemmap_shared_tail_page(order, device_zone(node));
> + if (!page)
> + return -ENOMEM;
>
> - /*
> - * Reuse the page that was populated in the prior iteration
> - * with just tail struct pages.
> - */
> + if (reuse_compound_section(start_pfn, pgmap))
> return vmemmap_populate_range(start, end, node, NULL,
> - pte_pfn(ptep_get(pte)), flags);
> - }
> + page_to_pfn(page), flags);
>
> - size = min(end - start, pgmap_vmemmap_nr(pgmap) * sizeof(struct page));
> + size = min(end - start, (1UL << order) * sizeof(struct page));
> for (addr = start; addr < end; addr += size) {
> unsigned long next, last = addr + size;
>
> @@ -546,12 +528,12 @@ static int __meminit vmemmap_populate_compound_pages(unsigned long start_pfn,
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> /*
> - * Reuse the previous page for the rest of tail pages
> + * Reuse the shared page for the rest of tail pages
> * See layout diagram in Documentation/mm/vmemmap_dedup.rst
> */
> next += PAGE_SIZE;
> rc = vmemmap_populate_range(next, last, node, NULL,
> - pte_pfn(ptep_get(pte)), flags);
> + page_to_pfn(page), flags);
Another report is like:
"
When this shared tail page is used to back the
DEV-DAX tail pages, could concurrent initialization
corrupt the compound_head pointer for the entire
node?
Looking at memmap_init_zone_device which calls
memmap_init_compound, the head page template is copied
unconditionally into the tail pages:
mm/mm_init.c:memmap_init_compound() {
for (pfn = head_pfn + 2; pfn < end_pfn; pfn++)
zone_device_page_init_from_template(pfn_to_page(pfn), pfn,
&template);
}
Since page_to_pfn(page) here points to a node-wide
shared physical page, would this template copy overwrite
the compound_head for all DEV-DAX tail pages on the node
to point to the latest initialized PMD's head page?
"
This is also a false positive.
memmap_init_compound() does not initialize the full
compound range when the section uses vmemmap optimization.
compound_nr_pages() limits it to:
2 * PAGE_SIZE / sizeof(struct page)
i.e. exactly the entries in the retained vmemmap page.
The shared mappings start at addr + PAGE_SIZE, so the
template-copy loop stops before reaching them.
Thanks
Muchun
> if (rc)
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
> @@ -883,13 +865,14 @@ int __meminit sparse_add_section(int nid, unsigned long start_pfn,
> if (IS_ERR(memmap))
> return PTR_ERR(memmap);
>
> + ms = __nr_to_section(section_nr);
> /*
> * Poison uninitialized struct pages in order to catch invalid flags
> * combinations.
> */
> - page_init_poison(memmap, sizeof(struct page) * nr_pages);
> + if (!section_vmemmap_optimizable(ms))
> + page_init_poison(memmap, sizeof(struct page) * nr_pages);
>
> - ms = __nr_to_section(section_nr);
> __section_mark_present(ms, section_nr);
>
> /* Align memmap to section boundary in the subsection case */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-08 4:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-08 3:03 [PATCH v2 00/11] mm: Switch device DAX to section-based vmemmap optimization Muchun Song
2026-09-08 3:03 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] mm/sparse-vmemmap: introduce CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP_OPTIMIZATION Muchun Song
2026-09-08 3:03 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] mm/sparse-vmemmap: factor out shared vmemmap tail page allocation Muchun Song
2026-09-08 3:03 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] mm/sparse-vmemmap: open-code init_compound_tail() Muchun Song
2026-09-10 7:50 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-09-08 3:03 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] mm/sparse-vmemmap: prepare DAX vmemmap population for section orders Muchun Song
2026-09-08 3:03 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] mm/sparse-vmemmap: set section order for device DAX Muchun Song
2026-09-08 3:03 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] mm/sparse-vmemmap: switch device DAX to shared tail vmemmap pages Muchun Song
2026-09-08 4:09 ` Muchun Song [this message]
2026-09-08 7:46 ` Qi Zheng
2026-09-08 8:34 ` Muchun Song
2026-09-08 3:03 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] mm/sparse-vmemmap: move HVO helpers to a public header Muchun Song
2026-09-08 8:19 ` Qi Zheng
2026-09-08 3:03 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] powerpc/mm: switch device DAX to shared tail vmemmap pages Muchun Song
2026-09-08 3:03 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] mm/sparse-vmemmap: drop the extra tail page from device DAX reservation Muchun Song
2026-09-08 9:09 ` Qi Zheng
2026-09-08 9:12 ` Muchun Song
2026-09-08 3:03 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] mm/sparse-vmemmap: drop unused section_nr_vmemmap_pages() arguments Muchun Song
2026-09-08 9:23 ` Qi Zheng
2026-09-08 3:03 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] Documentation/mm: update DAX vmemmap deduplication docs Muchun Song
2026-09-08 9:29 ` Qi Zheng
2026-09-09 1:45 ` [PATCH v2 00/11] mm: Switch device DAX to section-based vmemmap optimization Andrew Morton
2026-09-10 6:48 ` Muchun Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3856ab3a-5bc6-4483-a116-601ae431b2c1@linux.dev \
--to=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®