From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758273AbZBFCbU (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Feb 2009 21:31:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753189AbZBFCbH (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Feb 2009 21:31:07 -0500 Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com ([209.85.200.170]:35032 "EHLO wf-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752093AbZBFCbG (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Feb 2009 21:31:06 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=yBeMs13bTzzlIhpZMqkwBvAkzMwuT+mHGNRBLH68Ylc3DwMzJoZr12VJe6uFB+fjUs qD8jQZlTdq7O3Ok2l7CXIYEd4ad9VmlYEedO4ECWrdv01ywaWbqn7dP/Bj60/ZXLqi28 EyKCdZWZUmys7hXZG7HJZanzKOep9+XDiABWQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <200902051551.14146.david-b@pacbell.net> References: <1226994760-4301-1-git-send-email-cooloney@kernel.org> <200811201405.06811.david-b@pacbell.net> <386072610902050130k27c6d7far752ac49183bf36ae@mail.gmail.com> <200902051551.14146.david-b@pacbell.net> Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 10:31:05 +0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 894e7286b36b379a Message-ID: <386072610902051831k7b3530b1lc19a07b4a0e1eacc@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/16] Blackfin SPI Driver: ensure cache coherency before doing DMA From: Bryan Wu To: David Brownell Cc: Andrew Morton , Mike Frysinger , spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Vitja Makarov Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 7:51 AM, David Brownell wrote: > On Thursday 05 February 2009, Bryan Wu wrote: >> As you acked this patchset, is that possible to merge it? >> Or need Andrew to keep them in -mm for a while. > > ISTR *NOT* acking the whole series though. In fact, I recall > giving a generic NAK part way through because of patches that > didn't include comments (after manually NAKing many individual > patches) and ones where $SUBJECT didn't match the patch comments. > Plus even a few which seemed to be wrong. > > (And I've said the same thing about Blackfin patches before, > too. Please help the message get through to your co-workers: > make sure the patches come with useful public descriptions.) > > At this point, best to resend the whole series, with the > updates I requested. The few patches which I did ack can > include that ack. > OK, I will resend these 16 patches and next new 5 patches soon. Thanks a lot -Bryan