From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755831AbYIRFoU (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Sep 2008 01:44:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751580AbYIRFoL (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Sep 2008 01:44:11 -0400 Received: from ik-out-1112.google.com ([66.249.90.178]:52926 "EHLO ik-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751210AbYIRFoK (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Sep 2008 01:44:10 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=dGn7MptK2rfp+wQveLDAP8DiDUQucMpH5jU147oB30bloD0/3BHBehCKyT4PD8Byil nDWL/VulJGiKEB8X3xKWQ1rmKcgeJtS/BSlsianow5DCJiBZVzi2QkPh4E/Zdcj1Y63i Zuy2lYZEEHSnfD/jES1/J672bYrwDd8wjGiy0= Message-ID: <3877989d0809172244h196c79d6k67a9a024221b104a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 13:44:07 +0800 From: "Luming Yu" To: "Roland McGrath" Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] set TASK_TRACED before arch_ptrace code to fix a race Cc: "Petr Tesarik" , LKML , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20080917170122.7797E640A5@pipsqueak.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <3877989d0805211947i54bacc7cv619541e9b40824fb@mail.gmail.com> <3877989d0806031916wf11bb2t3847aa630fb39e60@mail.gmail.com> <48465D5C.8000804@suse.cz> <3877989d0806041849vb903aaw221de929e2ab8cb9@mail.gmail.com> <1212664605.15747.16.camel@elijah.suse.cz> <20080627204954.34F8B154231@magilla.localdomain> <3877989d0809082006v496bae4i1c0736f5d55e9b9f@mail.gmail.com> <20080910055504.9A2A41541FE@magilla.localdomain> <3877989d0809160150y385edd59i231aca8b1073ce14@mail.gmail.com> <20080917170122.7797E640A5@pipsqueak.localdomain> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The another mysterious that I completely don't understand probably needs your help. Why kernels with utrace patch applied on ia64 just work? Sounds like utrace delivers an extra SIGTRAP comparing with kernel without utrace code.. Dose it make sense? Hmm.. Sounds like a bug to me.. On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 1:01 AM, Roland McGrath wrote: > So is there or is there not any regression (change) in the kernel's behavior? > > If you are now just talking about strace's own code, then the place for > that is strace-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, not any kernel lists. > > > Thanks, > Roland >