From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753376AbcHQKis (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Aug 2016 06:38:48 -0400 Received: from bear.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.11]:50046 "EHLO bear.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753082AbcHQKip (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Aug 2016 06:38:45 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: davinci_all_defconfig: enable modules for sound on LCDK To: Karl Beldan References: <20160810200853.24275-1-kbeldan@baylibre.com> <20160810200853.24275-2-kbeldan@baylibre.com> <52f428a2-7818-5f3a-bb66-70e2eaa63e7a@ti.com> <20160817101331.GA8009@gobelin> CC: , , , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Russell King , Kevin Hilman , Karl Beldan , Peter Ujfalusi From: Sekhar Nori Message-ID: <388d5e63-ff82-ca88-c60a-24ad87700afd@ti.com> Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 16:08:03 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160817101331.GA8009@gobelin> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 17 August 2016 03:43 PM, Karl Beldan wrote: > On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 02:20:51PM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote: >> On Thursday 11 August 2016 01:38 AM, Karl Beldan wrote: >>> This is the minimal set of additional modules required to support audio >>> on the LCDK. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Karl Beldan >> >> This patch does not apply because Kevin already added some missing audio >> modules through commit "ARM: davinci_all_defconfig: enable DA850 audio >> as modules" >> >> Can you please rebase on master branch of my tree[1] and resend? >> > > I checked out your tree. > With Kevin's patch the needed modules get selected without needing 2/2. > > However I don't know why he used: > CONFIG_SND_DA850_SOC_EVM=m > instead of: > CONFIG_SND_DAVINCI_SOC_MCASP=m > CONFIG_SND_SOC_TLV320AIC3X=m > The former seems to me to be pre-DT style config. I used the latter in > 2/2 and thought that's what we'd start switching to ? Unless it is for > pre-DT compatibility ? I don't think this is related to DT. As you said, CONFIG_SND_DA850_SOC_EVM selects CONFIG_SND_DAVINCI_SOC_MCASP and CONFIG_SND_SOC_TLV320AIC3X anyway. To be honest, I am okay either way. Copying Peter to see if he has any preference. Thanks, Sekhar