From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754401AbXDQOBz (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Apr 2007 10:01:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754399AbXDQOBy (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Apr 2007 10:01:54 -0400 Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.162.234]:39978 "EHLO nz-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754400AbXDQOBx (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Apr 2007 10:01:53 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=nr+m3QCyvw286klyaOLk78fIg65wwzZ/Jj7SZZNQckoQei/oY19un00C6K7TMbXN0Sy3918tnmsoMphO9bvytTfiTD/K+e69ByUDLMERnca9308mlsjPEQo8NxP3Aro5D/Cmn4UDB2tN/96iyKkOkJxyT9BmWa64z7BZIetEFXg= Message-ID: <38b2ab8a0704170701p69fd547dwe3e2523ba5798b55@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 16:01:51 +0200 From: "Francis Moreau" To: "Herbert Xu" Subject: Re: [CRYPTO] is it really optimized ? Cc: "Evgeniy Polyakov" , helge.hafting@aitel.hist.no, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070417130431.GA8685@2ka.mipt.ru> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 4/17/07, Herbert Xu wrote: > > Yep. We don't need such a flag anyway. All we need is a way to tweak > the priority and Bob's your uncle. > Could you elaborate please, I don't see how you prevent others users to use this module with priority. Priority is a stuff that tells you which aes implementation to use but it does not prevent an implementation to be used several times... Thanks -- Francis