From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753717AbYIENif (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Sep 2008 09:38:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752953AbYIENi0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Sep 2008 09:38:26 -0400 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.172]:32488 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752821AbYIENiZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Sep 2008 09:38:25 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=bc6Gi5OnQcIvqbQF/Dz2hxb49YQbvbdbL1MM4Njdk/GVUM+JvjDvl9yeG7wA7TrpC3 gzBMw7Vgz/OHSyht+EWQR7EhpM3Su7Qxzgarv23ePBjryC9ThuRR6FBBj+ureAD/X35q yXu2IZOaL1CACSuaJSsJqisrsiF84Mcu7DCtE= Message-ID: <38b2ab8a0809050638m524feaeet51817a8207505b87@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 15:38:23 +0200 From: "Francis Moreau" To: "Jean Delvare" Subject: Re: qestion about I2C_CLASS_HWMON flag Cc: "Linux Kernel Mailing List" , i2c@lm-sensors.org In-Reply-To: <20080905151157.21b7f8ce@hyperion.delvare> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <38b2ab8a0809040043g7f944872l47f84c53bb213829@mail.gmail.com> <38b2ab8a0809040105j7ae3aca8xd334a4d203d9415b@mail.gmail.com> <20080904103707.557ac764@hyperion.delvare> <38b2ab8a0809040149u2bc0342h5c32b87f9277322f@mail.gmail.com> <20080904120855.7e7b9720@hyperion.delvare> <38b2ab8a0809050157yfb21b08v23ae368d3337c1ca@mail.gmail.com> <20080905112056.44b7b910@hyperion.delvare> <38b2ab8a0809050544l1914530clec53494e12c77ff5@mail.gmail.com> <20080905151157.21b7f8ce@hyperion.delvare> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 3:11 PM, Jean Delvare wrote: > On Fri, 5 Sep 2008 14:44:30 +0200, Francis Moreau wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 11:20 AM, Jean Delvare wrote: >> > Nothing prevents you from setting the class flags based on >> > platform-specific information if you have a need for that. >> >> Just to be sure, do you mean by hacking the adapter source code ? > > It's not about hacking, it can be done cleanly. Just have the adapter > driver code check for information in the platform data, and if class > information is provided, use that instead of the default value. Or if > all users will provide the information, don't even have a default in > the driver. Again, the class flags are a (needed) mechanism, the policy > is left for driver authors and platform maintainers to establish. > Ah OK I see now. On v2.6.23 i2c-gpio.c had no I2C_CLASS_HWMON flag set and had no way to pass this info from platform board. But on v2.6.27 it is now set whatever the platforms. Wouldn't it have been better to allow the platform code to pass this type information through the 'i2c_gpio_platform_data' structure for example ? Thanks Jean ! -- Francis