From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@gmail.com>
To: Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: sys_umount() returns EBUSY when doing: sh -c "mount /dev/sdc1 /mnt; umount /mnt"
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 13:09:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <38b2ab8a1003150509i4a9e7e1dqce2bfb11557d403d@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B9D0D1E.3010404@gmail.com>
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 03/13/2010 02:56 AM, Francis Moreau wrote:
>>
>> Hello
>>
>> I've some shell scripts which try to find out the filesystem hosted by
>> a block device.
>>
>> They basically do this:
>>
>> mount /dev/sdc1 /mnt
>> fs=$(stat -f -c %T $mount_point)
>> umount /mnt
>>
>> It happens to work but since an unknown upgrade (kernel, libs or tools
>> upgrade), umount(8) returns -EBUSY.
>>
>> I found that it's actually the sys_umount() which return -EBUSY.
>>
>> So the question, is this expected or is this a regression ?
>>
>> If it's expected then which operation should I add between the
>> mount(8) and umount(8) to make the mount operation completely finish
>> (inside the kernel) so the next umount won't return -EBUSY ?
>
> If no other process were involved I would say it's likely a bug. However, my
> guess is that some other process (HAL, something in GNOME, etc.) detects the
> mount and decides to start accessing the drive. Then when you immediately
> try to unmount, it fails because it's busy. I suspect if you try this in
> single-user mode with no unnecessary processes running you won't see this.
>
You're right, I don't see this anymore if I'm booting in a single user mode.
So I need to find out how to wait until these other processes stop
accessing the drive.
Thanks
--
Francis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-15 12:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-13 8:56 Francis Moreau
2010-03-14 16:21 ` Robert Hancock
2010-03-15 12:09 ` Francis Moreau [this message]
2010-03-16 11:06 ` Petr Uzel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=38b2ab8a1003150509i4a9e7e1dqce2bfb11557d403d@mail.gmail.com \
--to=francis.moro@gmail.com \
--cc=hancockrwd@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®