From: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, qyousef@layalina.io,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vschneid@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] sched: Minor changes for rd->overload access
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 11:34:54 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <38c39ea6-21df-44e9-96e7-6f6fd35822a7@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZgKApcWeuwxc2+WO@gmail.com>
On 3/26/24 1:30 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 3/25/24 4:06 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>>
>>> * Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> v2 -> v3:
>>>> - Wrapped check for value change inside ser_rd_overload_status
>>>> as suggested by Qais.
>>>> - Added reviewed-by tags.
>>>>
>>>> v1 -> v2:
>>>> - dropped Fixes tag.
>>>> - Added one of the perf probes in the changelog for reference.
>>>> - Added reviewed-by tags.
>>>>
>>>> tl;dr
>>>> When running workloads in large systems, it was observed that access to
>>>> rd->overload was taking time. It would be better to check the value
>>>> before updating since value changes less often. Patch 1/2 does that.
>>>> With patch updates happen only if necessary. CPU Bus traffic reduced a
>>>> bit. No significant gains in workload performance.
>>>
>>> Could you please post this against the latest scheduler tree, ie. tip:sched/core?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Ingo
>>
>> Hi Ingo. I had mentioned the same in cover letter. Sorry if I didn't
>> mention it in the correct place.
>>
>> *These patches depend on below to be applied first*
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240307085725.444486-1-sshegde@linux.ibm.com/
>>
>> After that the above patch would apply.
Hi Ingo.
These two patches apply cleanly now to sched/core.
7a9dd7ef946c (HEAD -> sched/core) sched/fair: Use helper functions to access rd->overload
4f24aa918558 sched/fair: Check rd->overload value before update
c829d6818b60 (origin/sched/core) sched/fair: Simplify the continue_balancing logic in sched_balance_newidle()
d0f5d3cefc25 sched/fair: Introduce is_rd_overutilized() helper function to access root_domain::overutilized
>
> OK, I missed that, but I don't really like patch #3 of that other series,
> so we'll need to address that first.
>
That will be a standalone patch now and can go later based on the discussions.
> Thanks,
>
> Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-27 6:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-25 5:45 Shrikanth Hegde
2024-03-25 5:45 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] sched/fair: Check rd->overload value before update Shrikanth Hegde
2024-03-28 10:47 ` [tip: sched/core] sched/fair: Check root_domain::overload " tip-bot2 for Shrikanth Hegde
2024-03-25 5:45 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] sched/fair: Use helper functions to access rd->overload Shrikanth Hegde
2024-03-28 10:47 ` [tip: sched/core] sched/fair: Use helper functions to access root_domain::overload tip-bot2 for Shrikanth Hegde
2024-03-25 10:36 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] sched: Minor changes for rd->overload access Ingo Molnar
2024-03-25 11:33 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2024-03-26 8:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2024-03-27 6:04 ` Shrikanth Hegde [this message]
2024-03-28 10:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2024-03-28 10:56 ` [tip: sched/core] sched/fair: Rename SG_OVERLOAD to SG_OVERLOADED tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2024-03-28 10:56 ` [tip: sched/core] sched/fair: Rename {set|get}_rd_overload() to {set|get}_rd_overloaded() tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2024-03-28 10:56 ` [tip: sched/core] sched/fair: Rename root_domain::overload to ::overloaded tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2024-03-28 11:07 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] sched: Minor changes for rd->overload access Ingo Molnar
2024-03-28 17:19 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2024-03-29 6:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2024-03-28 12:01 ` [tip: sched/core] sched/fair: Rename set_rd_overutilized_status() to set_rd_overutilized() tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2024-03-28 12:58 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] sched: Minor changes for rd->overload access Shrikanth Hegde
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=38c39ea6-21df-44e9-96e7-6f6fd35822a7@linux.ibm.com \
--to=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qyousef@layalina.io \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®