From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751394AbdHaL1X (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Aug 2017 07:27:23 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:54634 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751325AbdHaL1U (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Aug 2017 07:27:20 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] arm, arm64, cpufreq: frequency- and cpu-invariant accounting support for task scheduler To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, Greg Kroah-Hartman , Juri Lelli , Vincent Guittot , Peter Zijlstra , Morten Rasmussen , Viresh Kumar , Sudeep Holla References: <20170825143206.30467-1-dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> <11249770.4iDhbWWonU@aspire.rjw.lan> From: Dietmar Eggemann Message-ID: <38de527f-7a4e-7344-bba0-906c7920d03f@arm.com> Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 12:27:16 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <11249770.4iDhbWWonU@aspire.rjw.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Raphael, On 31/08/17 00:34, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, August 25, 2017 4:31:56 PM CEST Dietmar Eggemann wrote: [...] >> [1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=149625018223002&w=2 >> [2] https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=150118402232039&w=2 >> [3] https://marc.info/?l=linux-pm&m=149933474313566&w=2 >> [4] http://arminfo.emea.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.den0056a/DEN0056A_System_Control_and_Management_Interface.pdf >> [5] https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=149690865010019&w=2 >> >> Dietmar Eggemann (10): >> drivers base/arch_topology: free cpumask cpus_to_visit >> cpufreq: provide default frequency-invariance setter function >> cpufreq: arm_big_little: invoke frequency-invariance setter function >> cpufreq: dt: invoke frequency-invariance setter function >> drivers base/arch_topology: provide frequency-invariant accounting >> support >> drivers base/arch_topology: allow inlining cpu-invariant accounting >> support >> arm: wire frequency-invariant accounting support up to the task >> scheduler >> arm: wire cpu-invariant accounting support up to the task scheduler >> arm64: wire frequency-invariant accounting support up to the task >> scheduler >> arm64: wire cpu-invariant accounting support up to the task scheduler >> >> arch/arm/include/asm/topology.h | 8 ++++++++ >> arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h | 8 ++++++++ >> drivers/base/arch_topology.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++------ >> drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c | 10 +++++++++- >> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c | 12 ++++++++++-- >> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 6 ++++++ >> include/linux/arch_topology.h | 18 +++++++++++++++++- >> include/linux/cpufreq.h | 3 +++ >> 8 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) >> >> > > FWIW, patches [2-4/10] in this series are fine by me, but I guess you > need to talk to Viresh about the [3-4/10] anyway. Thanks for the review! Viresh already gave me his 'Acked-by' for [3-4/10] during the v3 review. Since this patch-set touches different subsystems I wonder via which tree it should go upstream? Could it go via your linux-pm tree or should I ask Greg K-H? Thanks, -- Dietmar [...]