mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@oracle.com>
To: "David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)" <david@kernel.org>,
	virtualization@lists.linux.dev
Cc: jasowang@redhat.com, xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com,
	eperezma@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] virtio_balloon: do not set pr_dev_info.report unconditionally
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2025 11:10:02 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <38ef7c75-195a-4145-bf35-3955aea8dd0d@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0d9f302a-301c-4335-9c78-bcccab824a9f@kernel.org>

Hi David,

On 12/10/25 12:09 AM, David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) wrote:
> On 12/9/25 22:23, Dongli Zhang wrote:
>> Do not set vb->pr_dev_info.report unconditionally if
>> VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_REPORTING is not available.
> 
> Can you share with us why you think that should be done? Please document the
> "why" and not only the "what".
> 
> Without VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_REPORTING, we'll never call page_reporting_register(),
> so it will never be used.
> 
> But the compiler cannot optimize it out. It only happens during driver loading,
> so I am not sure it is worth the churn?

When I was reading about the free-page reporting feature in virtio-balloon, I
was confused as to why pr_dev_info.report was always configured unconditionally.

Later, I looked at the implementation in the Hyper-V balloon driver and noticed
that it even resets pr_dev_info.report back to NULL if page_reporting_register()
fails (see line 1669).

1651 static void enable_page_reporting(void)
1652 {
1653         int ret;
1654
1655         if (!hv_query_ext_cap(HV_EXT_CAPABILITY_MEMORY_COLD_DISCARD_HINT)) {
1656                 pr_debug("Cold memory discard hint not supported by
Hyper-V\n");
1657                 return;
1658         }
1659
1660         BUILD_BUG_ON(PAGE_REPORTING_CAPACITY >
HV_MEMORY_HINT_MAX_GPA_PAGE_RANGES);
1661         dm_device.pr_dev_info.report = hv_free_page_report;
1662         /*
1663          * We let the page_reporting_order parameter decide the order
1664          * in the page_reporting code
1665          */
1666         dm_device.pr_dev_info.order = 0;
1667         ret = page_reporting_register(&dm_device.pr_dev_info);
1668         if (ret < 0) {
1669                 dm_device.pr_dev_info.report = NULL;
1670                 pr_err("Failed to enable cold memory discard: %d\n", ret);
1671         } else {
1672                 pr_info("Cold memory discard hint enabled with order %d\n",
1673                         page_reporting_order);
1674         }
1675 }

That's why I'd like to move the configuration of pr_dev_info.report inside the
if statement.

It's a purely non-functional change, intended only to make the initialization
look cleaner.

Apologies - I should have mentioned that this is a non-functional change in the
commit message.

Thank you very much!

Dongli Zhang



> 
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@oracle.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c | 3 ++-
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c
>> index 74fe59f5a78c..0c39f2415324 100644
>> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c
>> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c
>> @@ -1034,7 +1034,6 @@ static int virtballoon_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>>                    poison_val, &poison_val);
>>       }
>>   -    vb->pr_dev_info.report = virtballoon_free_page_report;
>>       if (virtio_has_feature(vb->vdev, VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_REPORTING)) {
>>           unsigned int capacity;
>>   @@ -1044,6 +1043,8 @@ static int virtballoon_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>>               goto out_unregister_oom;
>>           }
>>   +        vb->pr_dev_info.report = virtballoon_free_page_report;
>> +
>>           /*
>>            * The default page reporting order is @pageblock_order, which
>>            * corresponds to 512MB in size on ARM64 when 64KB base page
> 
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2025-12-10 19:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-09 21:23 Dongli Zhang
2025-12-10  8:09 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-12-10 19:10   ` Dongli Zhang [this message]
2025-12-17  4:52     ` Michael Kelley
2025-12-18  8:34       ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=38ef7c75-195a-4145-bf35-3955aea8dd0d@oracle.com \
    --to=dongli.zhang@oracle.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®